2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HBx affects CUL4–DDB1 function in both positive and negative manners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the interaction of HBx with DDB1 or WDR5 might interfere with the interaction between DDB1 and WDR5, providing protective effects against WDR5 degradation by DDB1, as observed in our study. It's interesting to note that HBx can exert its function on the ubiquitin protein degradation system in either a positive or negative manner . Many studies have demonstrated that HBx can interact with and hijack ubiquitin ligase to target proteins for degradation; yet, other studies have found that HBx can also inhibit ubiquitin ligase and thus stabilize target proteins, such as Pituitary Tumor‐Transforming Gene 1, protein arginine N‐methyltransferase 1, and Amplified in Breast Cancer 1, as we found for WDR5 in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In contrast, the interaction of HBx with DDB1 or WDR5 might interfere with the interaction between DDB1 and WDR5, providing protective effects against WDR5 degradation by DDB1, as observed in our study. It's interesting to note that HBx can exert its function on the ubiquitin protein degradation system in either a positive or negative manner . Many studies have demonstrated that HBx can interact with and hijack ubiquitin ligase to target proteins for degradation; yet, other studies have found that HBx can also inhibit ubiquitin ligase and thus stabilize target proteins, such as Pituitary Tumor‐Transforming Gene 1, protein arginine N‐methyltransferase 1, and Amplified in Breast Cancer 1, as we found for WDR5 in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To exclude this possibility and extend our observations to the circumstances of natural viral infection, we present two lines of evidence to establish that the HBV‐induced resection and HR defects represent a generalized phenomenon. First, we show that the defects in RPA phosphorylation and RAD51 IR‐induced foci (IRIF) hold true in an independently derived HBV‐positive cell line (T43) that was generated by integrating viral genomes into normal hepatic L02 cells (Fig. D,F; Supporting Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This poses the question as to whether the modulation of resection benefits viral replication. In previous work we showed that ablating DDB1 inhibited viral production and gene expression of HBV, indicating that DDB1 is required for viral production . Our preliminary data also suggest that loss of WDR70 facilitates viral replication (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DDB1 was first implicated in viral pathogenesis when it was shown to interact with h epatitis B protein X (HBx), which competitively inhibits DDB2 from interacting with DDB1 by binding to the same pocket (Bontron, 2002; Lee et al, 1995; Li et al, 2010). Although the precise mechanisms have not been uncovered, DDB1–HBx interactions can promote viral replication, induce cell death and potentially disrupt endogenous CRL4 activity (Guo et al, 2014; Leupin et al, 2005). …”
Section: Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%