2005
DOI: 10.1353/hbr.2005.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haʿam in the Turbulent Discursive Sphere of Israeli Bumper Stickers

Abstract: In recent years Israel's roads have become a public, open, and permanent sphere for discursive political dialogues, publicly displayed in the iconic medium of bumper stickers which give voice to strong feelings of identification and conflict. The private car has become a site through which a complex communication of schism and unity is conducted, using key terms of Jewish and Israeli identity. The present article focuses on expressions of identity and boundaries of "the people," or "the nation" articulated in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abel and Buckley (1977, p. 3) Basthomi (2007) argued that graffiti are related to any sort of symbols, scratches, drawings, signs, paintings found on walls or anywhere irrespective to what inspires the writing. Considering their various forms, they have been studied from different angles: social (Adams &Winter, 1997), cultural, religious (Chiluwa, 2008), political (Salamon, 2005, Morva, 2016, language learning (Mwangi, 2012), motivational and emotional (Peiris, and Jayantha, 2015), gendered (House, 2007, Matthews, et al, 2012, Haslem, 2012, linguistics (Grider, 1975, Abu-Jaber, et al, 2012 quantitative, preventative, and aesthetic (for more illustration see Gadsby, 1995).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abel and Buckley (1977, p. 3) Basthomi (2007) argued that graffiti are related to any sort of symbols, scratches, drawings, signs, paintings found on walls or anywhere irrespective to what inspires the writing. Considering their various forms, they have been studied from different angles: social (Adams &Winter, 1997), cultural, religious (Chiluwa, 2008), political (Salamon, 2005, Morva, 2016, language learning (Mwangi, 2012), motivational and emotional (Peiris, and Jayantha, 2015), gendered (House, 2007, Matthews, et al, 2012, Haslem, 2012, linguistics (Grider, 1975, Abu-Jaber, et al, 2012 quantitative, preventative, and aesthetic (for more illustration see Gadsby, 1995).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some were simple content analyses of the most common sticker themes or their semantics (AlMomani, Ahmad Jaradat, BaniKhair, Mohammad, & Alshaboul, 2017;Case, 1992;Endersby, & Towle, 1996;Jaradat, 2016;Stern & Solomon, 1992). Other studies went beyond simple classification and included speculation about the symbolic meaning of stickers for issues such as gender (Noble & Baldwin, 2001), religion (Chiluwa, 2008), family identity (Doyle & Tranter, 2015), law (Doyle & Tranter, 2016), consumer perceptions (Belk, 1988), national identity (Kriznar, 1993), and political discourse (Bloch, 2000a(Bloch, , 2000bSalamon, 2005). The studies were of limited value to the present study because empirical support for the interpretations was very limited or even nonexistent in some cases (e.g., Doyle & Tranter, 2015;Noble & Baldwin, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Scholars studying graffiti or stickers on various vehicles used a variety of terms to refer to this phenomenon: Bumper stickers (Bloch, 2000;Case, 1992Salamon, 2005, House, 2007 vehicle stickers (Chiluwa, 2008), truck graffiti (Basthomi, 2009;Farnia & Tohidian, 2013) or car written manuscripts (Divsalar & Nemati, 2012). It is worth noting that the term 'bumper stickers' was used by Rains et al (2009) to refer to sayings that are included in an e-mail signature file following personal identifiers such as one's name, phone number, and postal address.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She (ibid) investigated the cultural and linguistic functions of con safos graffiti within the Mexican-American community. Some scholars have seen graffiti as a means of language learning (Mwangi, 2012), as discourse of religious identity (Chiluwa, 2008), as political discourse (Mirzaalikhani, 2011;Obeng, 2000aObeng, , 2000bBloch, 2000;Case, 1992;Salamon, 2005), and as a gendered discourse (Moonwomon, 1995;House, 2007). Newhagen and Ancell, (1995), for example, believe that content analyses of bumper stickers through ethnographic methods and approaches in social psychology show that stickers are discursive means of expressing emotions and social status whereas Bloch (2000) believes that they are a spontaneous medium of protest evolving into a routinized form of public discourse.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%