2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HAZUS-MH Hurricane Model Methodology. II: Damage and Loss Estimation

Abstract: An overview of the damage and loss models used in the HAZUS-MH Hurricane Model is presented. These models represent the last two of five major component models used in HAZUS for the prediction of damage and loss to buildings subjected to hurricanes. The damage and loss models have been validated using damage data collected during poststorm damage surveys and insurance loss data. The HAZUS Hurricane Model represents an advance in the state of the art over most hurricane loss prediction models, in that it estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After several major hurricane and earthquake events worldwide, including Hurricane Hugo in 1989 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992, these firms made their models more sophisticated and their exposure databases more comprehensive (Cummins, 2007). Other companies subsequently developed in-house models, and US federal and state government supported development of two free open-source models: HAZUS-MH (Vickery et al, 2000a(Vickery et al, , 2000b(Vickery et al, , 2006a(Vickery et al, , 2006bFEMA, 2007) and the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model (FPHLM) (Powell et al, 2005;Pinelli et al, 2008). The details and assumptions of the free models are available in the peerreview literature and technical documents, because they are intended for risk mitigation, regulation and emergency preparation, but the majority of cat models are proprietary and intended for pricing insurance or reinsurance policies, so their details are not public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After several major hurricane and earthquake events worldwide, including Hurricane Hugo in 1989 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992, these firms made their models more sophisticated and their exposure databases more comprehensive (Cummins, 2007). Other companies subsequently developed in-house models, and US federal and state government supported development of two free open-source models: HAZUS-MH (Vickery et al, 2000a(Vickery et al, , 2000b(Vickery et al, , 2006a(Vickery et al, , 2006bFEMA, 2007) and the Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model (FPHLM) (Powell et al, 2005;Pinelli et al, 2008). The details and assumptions of the free models are available in the peerreview literature and technical documents, because they are intended for risk mitigation, regulation and emergency preparation, but the majority of cat models are proprietary and intended for pricing insurance or reinsurance policies, so their details are not public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The personalized risk and vulnerability assessment of ResRe requires an engineering-based loss model to establish the relationship between wind speed and expected monetary losses for a given residential structure type. This is publicly available in the HAZUS-HM hurricane catastrophe model, a peer-reviewed, multi-hazard catastrophe model distributed by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Vickery et al 2006). A primary component of HAZUS-HM is a library of loss functions that relate hurricane wind speed and expected building losses (normalized to the value of the home) for various building types.…”
Section: Development Of a Mobile Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches to loss estimation are mostly probabilistic (Jain, Davidson, and Rosowsky 2005). The most notable structural loss estimation functions were given by Vickery et al (2006) for developing a loss estimation methodology that was implemented in HAZUS for hurricanes, and by Cimellaro, Reinhorn, and Bruneau (2010), who expressed losses as a function of intensity of an earthquake and recovery time. A detailed explanation of structural loss represented by different researchers was given by Eren Tokgoz (2012).…”
Section: Structural Loss Estimation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%