Hazard Perception, Presence, and Simulation Sickness—A Comparison of Desktop and Head-Mounted Display for Driving Simulation

Abstract

Driving simulators are becoming increasingly common in driver training and assessment. Since virtual reality is generally regarded as an appropriate environment for measuring risk behavior, simulators are also used to assess hazard perception, which is considered to be one of the most important skills for safe driving. Simulators, which offer challenges that are indeed comparable to driving in real traffic, but at a very low risk of physical injury, have the potential to complement theoretical and practical driver trainings and tests. Although configurations and fidelity differ considerably between driving simulators, studies comparing the impact of their distinct features on driving performance and test validity remain rare. In this context, prior research demonstrated that a wider field of view (three monitors compared to a single monitor) led to earlier speed adjustments in response to potential hazards—especially for experienced drivers. The wider field of view was assumed to cause the drivers to be more present in the virtual world, which in turn provoked more natural scanning of the road and therefore, earlier hazard detection in experienced drivers. Research on spatial presence in other contexts support this assumption. The present experiment investigated whether this effect could be enhanced by an even more immersive presentation technique for driving simulation: a head-mounted display (HMD). Moreover, we studied the interplay between display mode, sense of presence and simulation sickness. Eighty experienced and less experienced drivers completed six simulation-based hazard perception scenarios, which were displayed either via a triple-monitor set-up or an HMD. Results indicate that the experienced drivers showed very similar driving and risk behavior as the inexperienced drivers in both experimental conditions. However, there were significant differences between the two display conditions. The use of an HMD resulted in a clearer and more abrupt speed reduction, more virtual presence, and a higher degree of simulation sickness. However, the interrelation between these three variables could not be conclusively clarified in the present study and thus represents a research aim that could be addressed in future studies.

Ranking Crossing Scenario Complexity for eHMIs Testing: A Virtual Reality Study

“…A strong sense of presence is thought to promote simulator validity [106,107]. Cumulative presence scores showed that overall, the scenarios performed well, as all average scores were equal to or greater than five (the maximum possible score being 7).…”

Development and initial validation of an open-access online Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT) for spider fear.

“…VR headsets eliminate visibility of the physical reality and enable accurate tracking of an individuals’ head movements. Previous research has, however, demonstrated that a sense of presence can still be achieved with a classical desktop screen setup (e.g., Buttussi & Chittaro, 2018; Kwon et al, 2013; Malone & Brünken, 2021). In terms of plausibility illusion, we argue that vBATon provides individuals with a realistic and plausible VE.…”

Broadened assessments, health education and cognitive aids in the remote memory clinic

“…The pandemic has accelerated the spread of RMTs, and it is clear that they will play an even more important role in diagnostics and treatments in the future. Virtual reality is already part of the gaming industry and will soon become the standard for assessing fitness to drive ( 31 ). Voice features will also gain importance as studies indicate their ability to detect cognitive impairment ( 32 – 34 ).…”