2002
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Have p53 gene mutations and protein expression a different biological significance in colorectal cancer?*

Abstract: p53 alterations are considered the most common genetic events in many types of neoplasms, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC). These alterations include mutations of the gene and/or overexpression of the protein. The aim of our study was to assess whether in 160 patients undergoing resective surgery for primary operable CRC there was an association between p53 mutations and protein overexpression and between these and other biological variables, such as cell DNA content (DNA-ploidy) and S-phase fraction (SPF)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40,41 Furthermore, it is known that accumulation of the nonmutated protein can occur due to the formation of complexes between p53 and other cellular proteins such as MDM2 or viral proteins such as the viral oncoprotein E6. 42 In conclusion, positive p53 stainings are not synonymous with TP53 mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…40,41 Furthermore, it is known that accumulation of the nonmutated protein can occur due to the formation of complexes between p53 and other cellular proteins such as MDM2 or viral proteins such as the viral oncoprotein E6. 42 In conclusion, positive p53 stainings are not synonymous with TP53 mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…There is, to judge by usage, no consensus on any optimal method for the use of IHC to detect abnormal accumulation of p53; nor is there any apparent agreement on how best to identify mutations in the 11 exons of the p53 gene. Given that mutation and accumulation, as detected by IHC, may be telling us different things (Bazan et al, 2002), it would be sensible if future studies combined both methods of assessment. Until procedures and approaches to the investigation of p53 status are standardised, there can be no real progress: Dix millions d'ignorances, ne font pas un savoir (Ten million errors do not leave us any the wiser; Hippolyte Taine, 1823 -1898).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study population consisted of 104 consecutive patients (73 male, 31 female; age range, 28 -84 years; mean 63.8 Ϯ 11.9 years) observed between January 1995 and December 2000, with histologically proven colon carcinoma. Patients meeting the Amsterdam II criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis CRC syndrome or with carcinomas associated with inflammatory bowel disease or with rectal cancers were not considered suitable for this study because their molecular features, recurrence rate, and overall survival can differ greatly from sporadic large bowel carcinomas, thus possibly causing misinterpretation of the results (15,28). Twenty-five subjects without colon carcinoma undergoing endoscopic biopsy of normal-appearing colon mucosa served as controls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%