2019
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hausdorff Dimension of Escaping Sets of Nevanlinna Functions

Abstract: We determine the exact values of Hausdorff dimensions of escaping sets of meromorphic functions with polynomial Schwarzian derivatives. This will follow from the relation between these functions and the second order differential equations in the complex plane.Mathematics Subject Classification: 30D05 (primary), 37F10 (secondary).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our starting point is the following theorem, which brings together results of several authors; see [GK18,McM87] (and also [Cui21b, Theorem 1]). By dim E we mean the Hausdorff dimension of the set E. Meromorphic functions in S 2 have explicit formulas; see Theorem 2.1 in the next section for a simple proof.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our starting point is the following theorem, which brings together results of several authors; see [GK18,McM87] (and also [Cui21b, Theorem 1]). By dim E we mean the Hausdorff dimension of the set E. Meromorphic functions in S 2 have explicit formulas; see Theorem 2.1 in the next section for a simple proof.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set plays a fundamental role in recent studies of transcendental dynamics. Starting with McMullen [McM87], a wide range of research focuses on estimating the Hausdorff dimensions of escaping sets; see, for instance, [Bar08, BKS09, RS10, Sch07] for some entire functions and [BK12, Cui21b, GK18] for certain meromorphic functions. Some of these papers also treat special Speiser functions.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have strict inequality in (1.1) for functions of the form R(e z ) [29] and for Nevanlinna functions [18]. In general, however, (1.1) is best possible.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%