2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.209602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hauschildet al.Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
184
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
15
184
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that although the coverage of the two (three) DIP films prepared on each substrate was not identical, we did not observe a significantly coverage-dependent bonding distance d H . Comparing these results with the bonding distances of PTCDA on the same metal surfaces, i.e., d H = 2.66Å on Cu(111), 16 d H = 2.86Å on Ag(111), 15,16 , and d H = 3.27Å on Au(111), 17 we see that the bonding distances follow the same order, i.e., d H …”
Section: A Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that although the coverage of the two (three) DIP films prepared on each substrate was not identical, we did not observe a significantly coverage-dependent bonding distance d H . Comparing these results with the bonding distances of PTCDA on the same metal surfaces, i.e., d H = 2.66Å on Cu(111), 16 d H = 2.86Å on Ag(111), 15,16 , and d H = 3.27Å on Au(111), 17 we see that the bonding distances follow the same order, i.e., d H …”
Section: A Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…[12][13][14] With respect to its chemical structure, DIP is a relatively simple, planar hydrocarbon without heteroatoms. In contrast to the intensely studied perylene derivative [15][16][17][18][19][20] 3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylic dianhydrid (PTCDA, C 32 H 8 O 6 ) with its four keto groups, the DIP-substrate interaction is not complicated by polar side groups, and the influence of intermolecular interactions is expected to be smaller than for PTCDA. 21 Here, we present a systematic study with high-precision experimental data and state-of-the-art calculations of DIP adsorbed on Cu(111), Ag(111), and Au(111).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar problems seem to arise in the calculation of adsorption geometries and bond properties, as indicated by a controversy about DFT calculations on PTCDA/Ag(111). [32][33][34] More successful was the recent application of a wave function based ab initio approach to benzene adsorbed on Cu(111). 35 In these calculations, London dispersion forces were considered explicitly on the level of Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), which led to remarkable accuracy of the adsorption energy and other quantities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBE+vdW surf calculations, on the other hand, predicted flat geometry (see Fig. 2) with adsorption energy of −1.380 eV (see Table I), more than 1.3 eV stronger than that predicted by PBE calculations, and adsorption height of 3.015Å, significantly smaller than the adsorption height obtained without including vdW corrections (4.432Å) and in the range of typical moleculesubstrate distances for aromatic molecules on metals (2.8-3.2Å) 34,35 . The adsorption height d is calculated as the vertical distance between the molecule's center of mass and the average positions of the Ag atoms in the uppermost layer.…”
Section: A Anthracene On Ag(111)mentioning
confidence: 94%