Hatay ili Kırıkhan ilçesi taban meralarının vejetasyon yapısı üzerine bir araştırma

Çinar, Selahattin; Hatipoğlu, Rüştü; Avcı, Mustafa; Inal, İlker; Yücel, Celal; Avağ, Arife

doi:10.13002/jafag678

Cited by 17 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If the changes in floristic composition are in favor of low-quality plants that may contain anti-nutritional compounds that may be toxic to grazing livestock (Casler and Undersander, 2019), this invasion (noxious invasive) can be very critical. Our results on the species recorded in the surveyed communities agree with previous findings on the rangelands of Turkey (Çınar et al, 2014;Sayar et al, 2015;Uzun et al, 2016;Uzun and Ocak, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…The identified forage species in the present study coincide with numerous previous studies in various regions of Turkey (Çınar et al, 2014;Sayar et al, 2015;Uzun et al, 2016;Ocak, 2018, 2019). However, in different rangelands of the region where the research was conducted, the rates of legumes and other botanical families have found to be higher than the rate of grass Ocak, 2018, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Floristic Patterns and Qualities of Forage Species from Mountainous Rangeland in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey

Aydın

Pak

Algan

et al. 2020

Turkish JAF Sci.Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was carried out to investigate the floristic features (family, preference by grazers, growth form and response to grazing) and qualities of forage species collected from mountainous rangeland (Akdağ Mountain, Ladik) in the middle Black Sea region of Turkey. Forage samples were collected five times by 15-day intervals from the before-flowering stage to the after-flowering stage in 2015 and 2016. The total number of species was 105 species belonging to 73 genera and related to 26 families. Of the total species, 20 were from Poaceae (19.0%), 30 were from Poaceae (28.6%). Rests of the species belonged to other families (52.4%) dominated by families such as Asteraceae (13/55) and Lamiaceae (6/55), of which 26 species were weeds harmful to animals. While the percentages of decreaser, increaser and invader species were 16.2, 12.4 and 71.4, those of annual, biennial and perennial species were 31.9, 2.9 and 65.2, respectively. The number of species preferred by grazing was 74 (70.5%), while the number of non-preferable species was 31 (29.5%). The ME (MJ kg-1), RFQ and quality category of legumes, grass, and other botanical families were found as 8.88±0.07, 130.9±3.05 and very good, 8.00±0.07, 83.2±1.62 and good, and 8.98±0.07, 141.0±3.62 and premium, respectively. These results can be used as a management tool to improve rangeland quality and sustainability. The evidence from this study is that floristic pattern is not merely a result of invader forage species, but also might be a beneficial result that deserves further study for mountainous rangelands.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Floristic Patterns and Qualities of Forage Species from Mountainous Rangeland in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey

Aydın

Pak

Algan

et al. 2020

Turkish JAF Sci.Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, the species richness and diversity in the rangelands decreased depending on the GP due to augments in disturbance created by grazing livestock that facilitated establishment of invader species, as reported by Alexander et al (2016). Also, it has been reported similar findings on rangelands in different regions of Turkey (Ünal et al, 2014;Yavuz et al, 2012;Çınar et al, 2014;Uzun et al, 2015;Seydoşoğlu et al, 2018). These results may be related to the fact that goats habitually spend more time grazing, including rangelands with high shrub species (Benavides et al, 2009;Ferreira et al, 2013;Nampanzira et al, 2015) and/or that the presence of cattle at different numbers can dramatically altered plant species composition (Read et al, 2011;Erkovan et al, 2016).…”

Section: Experiments Imentioning

confidence: 69%

“…As reported by Koç and İleri (2016), species composition was different at rangeland vegetation depend on the GAS. In the previous studies in Turkey (Yavuz et al, 2012;Çınar et al, 2014;Ünal et al, 2014;Uzun et al, 2015;İspirli et al, 2016;Seydoşoğlu et al, 2018), it has been noted that the abundance of invasive species in the BC of rangelands is high due to both regional conditions and utilization methods (Seydoşoğlu et al, 2018), which is an indicator of overgrazing. Therefore, the high abundance of both the other families and invader species in the studied rangelands may be related to the GP as well as the GAS, as reported in the previously studies (Batchelor et al, 2015;Uzun et al, 2016).…”

Section: 2 Experiments IImentioning

confidence: 95%

Uzun süre farklı otlatma baskısında bir veya birden fazla hayvan türü ile otlatılan meraların bazı vejetasyon karakteristikleri (Durum çalışması: Zonguldak ili, Türkiye)

Uzun¹,

Ocak²

2019

Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two studies were carried out to evaluate the rangelands subjected to grazing pressures (GP) at different levels with single (SSG, cattle) -or multi (MSG, cattle, sheep and goats)-grazing animals species (GAS) for a long time in Zonguldak province, Turkey. These studies were done in 2015 and 2016 years. The GP treatment was classified as <0.30 (very low, VL), 0.31 to 0.60 (low, L), 0.61 to 0.90 (high, H) and 0.91< (very high, VH) livestock unit (LU) ha -1 . The percentages of decreaser, increaser and invader range plant species, including shrub and herbaceous species and rangeland condition score interacted among the GP and GAS treatments. The percentages of decreaser species in the MSG communities under the L level and in the SSG communities under the VH level were higher compared to other treatments. The rate of shrub species in the VL rangeland subjected to SSG was higher than that in the VH rangeland. The rate of shrub species in VH range subjected to MSG was higher than that in other ranges subjected to MSG and in VH range subjected to SSG. The frequencies of decreaser and invader species of SSG were higher than that of MSG, but the frequency of increaser species was lower than that of MSG. The range condition class for the SSG and MSG rangelands were "poor" and "fair", respectively. These results indicate that increasing GP prevents animals from grazing selectively and the MSG system can contribute to the control of weeds.Uzun süre bir veya birden fazla hayvan türü ile farklı otlatma baskılarına maruz kalan meraların bazı vejetasyon özellikleri (Zonguldak ili örneği, Türkiye) Keywords: Grazing livestock Overgrazing Rangeland condition Response to grazing Stocking rate Weed control ÖZET Zonguldak ilinde uzun süre bir (BTO; sığır) veya birden fazla (karışık) hayvan türü (KTO; sığır, koyun ve keçi) ile farklı seviyelerde otlatma baskısına maruz kalan meraların değerlendirilmesi için 2015 ve 2016 yıllarında iki çalışma yapılmıştır. Otlatma baskısı muameleleri şu şekilde oluşturulmuştur: büyük baş hayvan birimi (BBHB) ha -1 <0.30 (çok düşük, ÇD), 0.31-0.60 (düşük, D), 0.61-0.90 (yüksek, Y) ve 0.91< (çok yüksek, ÇY). Çalı ve otsu türler de dâhil azalıcı, çoğalıcı ve istilacı bitki türleri ve mera durum skorları üzerine otlatma baskısı ve hayvan türü arasındaki etkileşimin etkisi önemli bulunmuştur. Çalı ve otsu türler de dâhil azalıcı, çoğalıcı ve istilacı bitki türleri ve mera durum skorları üzerine otlatma baskısı ve hayvan türü arasındaki etkileşimin etkisi önemli bulunmuştur. Azalıcı türlerin oranı bakımından, D otlatma basınçlı KTO sistemine ve ÇY otlatma basınçlı BTO sistemine ait meralar, diğer otlatma basınçlı sistemlere ait meralardan daha yüksek bir değere sahip olmuştur. BTO sistemine ait meralardaki çalı türlerinin yüzdesi, ÇD otlatma basıncında, ÇY otlatma basıncı ile karşılaştırıldığında daha yüksek bulunmuştur. ÇY otlatma basınçlı KTO sistemine ait meralardaki çalı türlerinin oranı, diğer otlatma basınçlı KTO sistemine ve ÇY otlatma basınçlı BTO sistemine ait meralardakinden daha yüksek bulunmuştur....

show abstract

“…In various provinces across Turkey and particularly in the Eastern Anatolia Region, which constitutes 34.8% of our country's rangeland areas, numerous studies have been conducted on rangelands (Yavuz et al, 2012;Çınar et al, 2014;Ünal et al, 2014;Çomaklı et al, 2015;Uzun et al, 2015;Alay et al, 2016;Erkovan et al, 2016;Koç and İleri, 2016;Reis and Şen, 2017;Seydoşoğlu et al, 2018). However, to date, no study has been conducted on grazing sites involving both sheep and cattle or a combination of both.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in Feed Quality in Rangeland Sites Grazing by Different Livestock Species

Güllap,

Kazaz

2024

Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study conducted in the Umudum neighborhood of Erzurum province in 2023, three different rangeland sites (cattle, cattle + sheep, and sheep) were examined. The study investigated the existing feed quantity, crude protein, NDF, ADF ratios, and NYD values. It was observed that the rangeland site with sheep grazing had lower feed quantity, crude protein ratio, and NYD value compared to the sites with cattle and cattle + sheep grazing, while it had higher NDF and ADF ratios.

show abstract

Hatay ili Kırıkhan ilçesi taban meralarının vejetasyon yapısı üzerine bir araştırma

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Floristic Patterns and Qualities of Forage Species from Mountainous Rangeland in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey

Floristic Patterns and Qualities of Forage Species from Mountainous Rangeland in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey

Uzun süre farklı otlatma baskısında bir veya birden fazla hayvan türü ile otlatılan meraların bazı vejetasyon karakteristikleri (Durum çalışması: Zonguldak ili, Türkiye)

Changes in Feed Quality in Rangeland Sites Grazing by Different Livestock Species

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About