1998
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the mortality of septic shock changed with time?

Abstract: The present review showed a slight reduction in mortality from septic shock over the years, although this result should be approached with caution. The heterogeneity of the articles and absence of a severity score for most of the studies limited our analysis. Furthermore, there was an increasing prevalence of Gram-positive causative organisms, and a change of the predominant origin of sepsis from the abdomen to the chest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

15
250
2
41

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
15
250
2
41
Order By: Relevance
“…(49.7%) [28], but higher than that reported in the Finnsepsis study (28.3%) [29]. The impact on mortality of nosocomial sepsis versus community-acquired sepsis was similar to the recently published results of Alberti et al [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…(49.7%) [28], but higher than that reported in the Finnsepsis study (28.3%) [29]. The impact on mortality of nosocomial sepsis versus community-acquired sepsis was similar to the recently published results of Alberti et al [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the USA alone, 750,000 cases of sepsis occur each year, and more than 215,000 patients die of sepsis-induced damage because the known endotoxemia antagonists are only able to partially suppress sepsis symptoms (Martin et al 2003). The growing frequency of sepsis syndrome observed in the modern world may be partially explained by complications often observed after chemotherapy in cancer patients, organ transplantation, cardiac surgery, and prosthesis use (Friedman et al 1998;Vincent 2008). Moreover, in 40-60% of all patients with severe sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome often develops, coupled with acute lung dysfunction, which usually results in mortality (Gong et al 2005;MacCallum and Evans 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant advances in medical diagnosis and treatment, the overall survival in sepsis has not improved substantially over time [2,3]. This can partly be explained by the fact that sepsis is not a disease, but a syndrome comprising heterogeneous pathophysiological entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%