2006
DOI: 10.12927/hcq..18407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has Ontario's Stroke System Really Made a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous report from the RSCN found that between 2000 and 2003, the number of stroke presentations increased from 9.9% to 10.3%. 61 A system of organized stroke care, such as implemented across Ontario in 2001, may have also improved the identification of stroke at both the pre-hospital and hospital phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous report from the RSCN found that between 2000 and 2003, the number of stroke presentations increased from 9.9% to 10.3%. 61 A system of organized stroke care, such as implemented across Ontario in 2001, may have also improved the identification of stroke at both the pre-hospital and hospital phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Data from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network, which included information from 21 hospitals in 8 provinces from June 2001 to February 2002, indicated variations in the time from stroke onset to hospital arrival, administration of acute thrombolysis, admission to units specializing in stroke care and use of anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. 7 Populationbased chart audits from across Canada [8][9][10][11][12] indicated considerable variations in stroke care across geographic regions and across hospitals based on their size and designation as a "stroke centre." The 2006 National Stroke Audit in the United Kingdom, the Get With The Guidelines program in the United States and a pilot analysis of stroke indicators in Germany also reported performance differences across sites on several similar stroke indicators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hersh et al (2006) found that there were only a small number of well-designed telestroke studies, particularly in rural settings. There is a need for more rigorously designed randomised controlled trials and longitudinal observational studies of clinical outcomes to demonstrate the effective use of telemedicine in stroke survivors discharged from hospital (Lewis et al 2006). …”
Section: Future Trends and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%