2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, concepts such as the capitalist notion of value or celebration of the absolute domination of nature are falsely imputed to Marx (and Engels), who were in fact highly critical of these ideas [41,42]. Similarly, failures to understand how dialectics entail a combination of identity and distinction in unity has led scholars to inaccurately characterize Marx's approach as either dualistic or monistic [43,44], when it is in truth neither [45,46].…”
Section: Lefebvre and The Metabolic Riftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, concepts such as the capitalist notion of value or celebration of the absolute domination of nature are falsely imputed to Marx (and Engels), who were in fact highly critical of these ideas [41,42]. Similarly, failures to understand how dialectics entail a combination of identity and distinction in unity has led scholars to inaccurately characterize Marx's approach as either dualistic or monistic [43,44], when it is in truth neither [45,46].…”
Section: Lefebvre and The Metabolic Riftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marx coined the term "metabolic rift," illustrating how industrialization disrupts the centuries-old metabolism between society and nature, creating a gap [3]. Although the metabolic rift has Marxist connotations, it can contribute to the understanding and guidance of social metabolism [4]. Thus, decoupling in the economy is needed towards an inclusive and circular approach [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4. Castree (2000) denied that Smith succumbed fully to monism, despite his tendency to see nature completely subsumed by society, while conversely accusing Engels of dualism because he treated nature, in the sense of external nature, as non-identical and relatively autonomous from society. This raises the question of what constitutes monism and dualism for Castree (see Napoletano et al, 2018; Napoletano et al, 2019), and whether there is any room for dialectical or ontological distinctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%