2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1341-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvest residue management effects on tree growth and ecosystem carbon in a Chinese fir plantation in subtropical China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hook) is a native conifer timber species and has been widely planted in subtropical China for more than 1000 years due to its fast growth and good timber quality. Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations now cover 9.11 million hectares and account for more than 18 % of all forest plantations in China and 5 % of all plantations in the world (Huang et al 2013b). Field observations suggest that growth of C. lanceolata after harvest and replanting is significantly reduced and this problem occurs in many C. lanceolata growing regions (Fang 1987), which has drawn considerable attention (Zhang 1997;Huang et al 2000a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hook) is a native conifer timber species and has been widely planted in subtropical China for more than 1000 years due to its fast growth and good timber quality. Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations now cover 9.11 million hectares and account for more than 18 % of all forest plantations in China and 5 % of all plantations in the world (Huang et al 2013b). Field observations suggest that growth of C. lanceolata after harvest and replanting is significantly reduced and this problem occurs in many C. lanceolata growing regions (Fang 1987), which has drawn considerable attention (Zhang 1997;Huang et al 2000a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the lands with the territory of the legume residues returned to the soil, has higher organic carbon. Huang et al (2013) conducted that soil carbon stocks in the 0-10 cm of soil depth has not a significant difference with stubble burning and residue removal at the level of 5% because stubble burning decreases of organic residues and residue removal leads to biomass and soil respiration reduction.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, no losses in soil C or nutrient stocks have been reported, even with increases in nutrients exported during harvest [4,14,[29][30][31][32][33]. This observation has been attributed to several mechanisms: high buffer capacity of the soil, slow decomposition of forest residues, a long harvesting return interval (more than seven years), and fast growth and litter deposition from new Eucalyptus plantations.…”
Section: Effects Of Harvest Residue Strategies On Soil C and Availablmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the small effect of whole-tree harvest on the soil nutrient stocks described by many authors [4,14,[29][30][31][32][33], this and other studies emphasize the importance of the maintenance of forest residues on the soil, especially in tropical sites with low buffer capacity soils, high productivity, and short cycle plantations [14,16,[29][30][31]33]. In these sites, removal of forest residues can result in loss of wood productivity of up to 40% due to the low nutrient pools remaining in the soil [16].…”
Section: Management Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%