2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2014.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hartree–Fock energy of a finite two-dimensional electron gas system in a jellium background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Density remains constant in the N → ∞, L → ∞ limit. We must remember that, differently from other conventional 2DEG systems treated in the literature [11,12], the current model assumes an anisotropic (effective) mass for the electrons. The Hamiltonian is:…”
Section: Theory and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density remains constant in the N → ∞, L → ∞ limit. We must remember that, differently from other conventional 2DEG systems treated in the literature [11,12], the current model assumes an anisotropic (effective) mass for the electrons. The Hamiltonian is:…”
Section: Theory and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-dimensional systems in which electrons are restricted to move in less than three spatial dimensions have always attracted great interest as a result of novel theoretical phenomena and potential for technological applications in the field of electronic devices and materials. In particular, a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) system where electrons interact with a standard Coulomb interaction potential is one of the most widely studied problems in theoretical condensed matter physics 1 , 2 . Unexpected behavior occurs when a 2DEG system is subject to a strong perpendicular magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, calculation of the resulting Coulomb integrals corresponding to the self-energy of a uniformly charged square or cube turns out to be a highly non-trivial task. These type of integrals are often found in physics and chemistry theoretical models [16][17][18][19], and are computationally costly. Their numerical evaluation encounters two main drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%