2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing the Immunotherapy Revolution for the Treatment of Childhood Cancers

Abstract: Cancer immunotherapies can be classified into agents that amplify natural immune responses (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors) versus synthetic immunotherapies designed to initiate new responses (e.g., monoclonal antibodies [mAbs], chimeric antigen receptors [CARs]). Checkpoint inhibitors mediate unprecedented benefit in some adult cancers, but have not demonstrated significant activity in pediatric cancers, likely due their paucity of neoantigens. In contrast, synthetic immunotherapies such as mAbs and CAR T cells … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
1
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…47 In contrast with evidence for TAMs associating with outcome in NB, there is no published clinical evidence for an adaptive T lymphocyte response against human NBs. 48 T lymphocyte responses in NB patients may be limited by absent expression of MHC class I molecules and by a low frequency of somatic mutations in the tumor cells. 2427 We therefore used NSG and NOD/SCID mice as models for deficient T lymphocyte responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 In contrast with evidence for TAMs associating with outcome in NB, there is no published clinical evidence for an adaptive T lymphocyte response against human NBs. 48 T lymphocyte responses in NB patients may be limited by absent expression of MHC class I molecules and by a low frequency of somatic mutations in the tumor cells. 2427 We therefore used NSG and NOD/SCID mice as models for deficient T lymphocyte responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential targets for new treatments for CCSK patients might be BCOR ITDs (identified in about 80-90% of CCSKs), hypermethylation of TCF21 (identified in about 80-90% of CCSKs) or the YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion gene (identified in 5-10% of CCSKs) 9,13,14 . Finally, immunotherapy might be a therapeutic option for patients with CCSK in the future 73 .…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sur 8 patients évaluables 2, ont obtenu une réponse objective. Cependant l'utilisation de CAR de 2 e génération a été décevante avec une absence de réponse chez 11 patients après la 6 e semaine de traitement et l'absence de persistance des CAR [31].…”
Section: Neuroblastomeunclassified