2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-006-0122-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing earth observation (EO) capabilities in hydrogeology: an Indian perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The satellite was mainly designed for terrain modeling and large-scale mapping [ 3 , 10 - 16 ]. Nevertheless, in previous studies Cartosat-1 data have been also used in different fields, such as natural hazards assessment [ 4 , 5 ], archaeological exploration [ 6 ], estimation of hydrological parameters [ 7 , 8 ] or estimation of atmospheric aerosols [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satellite was mainly designed for terrain modeling and large-scale mapping [ 3 , 10 - 16 ]. Nevertheless, in previous studies Cartosat-1 data have been also used in different fields, such as natural hazards assessment [ 4 , 5 ], archaeological exploration [ 6 ], estimation of hydrological parameters [ 7 , 8 ] or estimation of atmospheric aerosols [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various statistical methods that were adopted by various authors for groundwater potential mapping elsewhere such as: frequency ratio (Guru et al 2017;Al-Zuhairy et al 2017;Razandi et al 2015), Analytical hierarchical process Chowdhury et al 2009;Razandi et al 2015), binary logistic regression method (Ozdemir 2011a), weight of evidence model (Ghorbani et al 2017;Tahmassebipoor et al 2016;Ozdemir 2011b), k-nearest neighbor (Naghibi and Dashtpagerdi 2017), Demster-Shafer model , machine learning model/artificial neural network (Lee et al 2012), boosted regression tree BRT (Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015;Naghibi et al 2016), multivariate adaptive regression spline (Zabihi et al 2016), maximum, entropy model ), generalized adaptive model (Falah et al 2016), random forest model (Rahmati et al 2018), and other GIS-based models such as earth observation and entropy weighted linear aggregate novel approach (Bandyopadhyay et al 2007;Al-Abadi et al 2016). In the above studies, themes such as vegetation, land use/land cover, hydrogeomorphology, drainage, lithology, subsurface lithology, structure, and slope were interpreted to infer groundwater potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%