2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing digital technologies for poverty reduction. Evidence for low-income and lower-middle income countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper contributes to the literature by providing a more comprehensive analysis than previous studies that were relatively more partial in examining the impact of internet penetration on inclusive growth. The most recent study on the link of the internet to indicators of inclusive growth can be separated into three categories: i) the internet and changes in per capita income (Maurseth, 2018;Hussain, Batool, Akbar & Nazir, 2021;Abdulqadir & Asongu, 2022); ii) internet and income inequality (Bauer, 2018;Canh, Schinckus, Thanh & Hui Ling, 2020;Du, Zhou, Cao, Zhang, Chen & King, 2021); and iii) internet and poverty (Yang, Lu, Wang & Li, 2021;Lechman & Popowska, 2022). The next part of this paper will reconcile the theoretical framework scattered in previous studies to serve as the basis for formulating recommendations for inclusive economic growth during the digitalization era.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Evolution Of Inclusive Growth In Indonesiamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This paper contributes to the literature by providing a more comprehensive analysis than previous studies that were relatively more partial in examining the impact of internet penetration on inclusive growth. The most recent study on the link of the internet to indicators of inclusive growth can be separated into three categories: i) the internet and changes in per capita income (Maurseth, 2018;Hussain, Batool, Akbar & Nazir, 2021;Abdulqadir & Asongu, 2022); ii) internet and income inequality (Bauer, 2018;Canh, Schinckus, Thanh & Hui Ling, 2020;Du, Zhou, Cao, Zhang, Chen & King, 2021); and iii) internet and poverty (Yang, Lu, Wang & Li, 2021;Lechman & Popowska, 2022). The next part of this paper will reconcile the theoretical framework scattered in previous studies to serve as the basis for formulating recommendations for inclusive economic growth during the digitalization era.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Evolution Of Inclusive Growth In Indonesiamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The integration of the digital economy and manufacturing industry has the positive effect on the industrial structure (Xu et.al, 2020), resource con guration (Zuo et.al, 2020) and the capacity of regional innovation (Wen et.al, 2019). Lechman and Popowska (2022) thought that the digital economy has the positive effect on the educational development, and then reduce the urban poverty. Digital economy could simplify the process of the education and improve the quality of the education and the level of human capital (Song et al,2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of studies have been conducted from the perspectives of agricultural supply-side reform, digital finance, rural e-commerce, rural governance, ecological livability, rural civilization, etc. The research results mainly focus on the positive impact of the digital economy on rural revitalization, which is reflected in the following aspects: First, the digital economy improves residents' incomes, promotes household consumption, enhances the efficiency of poverty alleviation, and improves entrepreneurial vitality [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Secondly, digital technology can accurately obtain agricultural production data, promote precise control of agriculture, and realize the digitization of agricultural production and agricultural operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%