2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1584-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnack's Inequality for Degenerate and Singular Parabolic Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
302
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
302
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As remarked in [16], this result would follow from Lemma 3.3, if we could control the dependency of the constants with respect to the amount of positivity, i.e. the constant δ in Lemma 3.3.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 33mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As remarked in [16], this result would follow from Lemma 3.3, if we could control the dependency of the constants with respect to the amount of positivity, i.e. the constant δ in Lemma 3.3.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 33mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The weighted version (with Muckenhoupt weights) was investigated by Chiarenza and Serapioni [9]. In the case 2 ≤ p < ∞, the corresponding Harnack inequality was proved by DiBenedetto, Gianazza and Vespri in [15], see also [16], and by Kuusi using a different approach in [35].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because u ∈ C ∞ (Q + ) and also, u ∈ C ∞ (Q 1 ), where Q + and Q 1 is mentioned as before, many authors (see [8,15,16,18,20,22,26]) discussed the Harnark inequalities in Q + and the smoothness of free boundary…”
Section: ) C = O(t γ ) For Large T Andmentioning
confidence: 98%