Harmony in intelligent hybrid teams: the influence of the intellectual ability of artificial intelligence on human members’ reactions

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper was to investigate the relationships among the intellectual ability of artificial intelligence (AI), cognitive emotional processes and the positive and negative reactions of human members. The authors also examined the moderating role of AI status in teams.Design/methodology/approachThe authors designed an experiment and recruited 120 subjects who were randomly distributed into one of three groups classified by the upper, middle and lower organization levels of AI in the team. The findings in this study were derived from subjects’ self-reports and their performance in the experiment.FindingsRegardless of the position held by AI, human members believed that its intelligence level is positively correlated with dependence behavior. However, when the AI and human members are at the same level, the higher the intelligence of AI, the more likely it is that its direct interaction with team members will lead to conflicts.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper only focuses on human–AI harmony in transactional work in hybrid teams in enterprises. As AI applications permeate, it should be considered whether the findings can be extended to a broader range of AI usage scenarios.Practical implicationsThese results are helpful for understanding how to improve team performance in light of the fact that team members have introduced AI into their enterprises in large quantities.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on how the intelligence level of AI affects the positive and negative behaviors of human members in hybrid teams. The study also innovatively introduces “status” into hybrid organizations.

Stress Management in The Banking Industry of Pakistan: Emotion Regulation as A Moderator in Employee Conflict Behavior

“…According to Rahim et al (2000), dominating behavior forces compliance from conflicting parties, often at the expense of their needs, concerns, or opportunities. This approach prioritizes self-interest and is particularly prevalent in situations where power hierarchies or status differentials exist (Chen et al, 2022). Dominating conflict behaviors have been implicated in elevated job stress levels.…”

Assessing training on digital gender based violence in higher education taking into account gender and sexual orientation

“…Patriarchal structures should be placed in the centre of the debate, especially when it comes to technology. The emergence of the manosphere on the internet reconfigures and reinforces these structures, but we should also pay attention to the broader construction of the relationship between gender and technologies (Chen et al., 2022; Gil‐Juárez et al., 2018; Vall‐llovera et al., 2021; Vergés Bosch, 2021; Vitores & Gil‐Juárez, 2016).…”