1995
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511526220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonic Approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that the topological condition in Theorem 1 coincides with that obtained by Stray [14] in connection with Farrell sets for holomorphic functions, even though the two proofs have little in common and the theory of harmonic approximation differs significantly from its holomorphic counterpart (see [4]). This topological characterization also arises in connection with "Mergelyan sets" for holomorphic and harmonic functions (see [14] and [5]).…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let F Be a Relatively Closed Subset Of B Then F mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting that the topological condition in Theorem 1 coincides with that obtained by Stray [14] in connection with Farrell sets for holomorphic functions, even though the two proofs have little in common and the theory of harmonic approximation differs significantly from its holomorphic counterpart (see [4]). This topological characterization also arises in connection with "Mergelyan sets" for holomorphic and harmonic functions (see [14] and [5]).…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let F Be a Relatively Closed Subset Of B Then F mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…(We refer to Chapter 7 of [1] for an account of the notion of thinness.) Thus we can appeal to the Keldyš-Deny approximation theorem (Theorem 7.9.5 of [1], or Theorem 1.3 of [4]) to see that there is a harmonic function H on some neighbourhood of V such that…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorems 1 and 2 will then be proved in the remaining two sections, along with their respective corollaries. The possibility that Theorem 2 might hold was initially suggested by earlier work of the author on the extension of superharmonic functions (see [8], or Chapter 6 of [9]). For the necessary potential theoretic background we refer to the books [22] and [1].…”
Section: Open Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (q k ) is an enumeration of Q, then u extends to a locally constant (and hence harmonic) function on an open set which contains E. It is easy to check that B * \E is connected and locally connected (see §3.2 of [9] for a discussion of local connectedness in this context). We note that, if z ∈ ∂B\A and 0 < δ < 1, then there exists a (smallest) number k 0 such that z ∈ F k0 and a number ε z,δ in (0, 1) such that…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%