2021
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonic Amplitude Summation for Frequency-tagging Analysis

Abstract: In the approach of frequency tagging, stimuli that are presented periodically generate periodic responses of the brain. Following a transformation into the frequency domain, the brain's response is often evident at the frequency of stimulation, F, and its higher harmonics (2F, 3F, etc.). This approach is increasingly used in neuroscience, as it affords objective measures to characterize brain function. However, whether these specific harmonic frequency responses should be combined for analysis—and if so, how—r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we analysed the sum across all significant harmonics (Retter et al, 2021) to test whether possible group differences were specific to the first harmonic (i.e., the stimulation frequency) or also present at integer multiples of the stimulation frequency (i.e., higher harmonics). The full details and results of this analysis can be found in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we analysed the sum across all significant harmonics (Retter et al, 2021) to test whether possible group differences were specific to the first harmonic (i.e., the stimulation frequency) or also present at integer multiples of the stimulation frequency (i.e., higher harmonics). The full details and results of this analysis can be found in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure identified 3 relevant harmonics: 2.4 Hz (F), 4.8 Hz (2F), and 7.2 Hz (3F). For each of these 3 harmonics, we then calculated the baseline-subtracted amplitudes for each participant, condition, and electrode using the same baseline as for the z-scores and these amplitudes were summed to quantify the brain response (Retter et al, 2021; Retter & Rossion, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the non-scrambled condition, this means that it is the frequency at which the walker took a step with the same foot. Although we had no a-priori predictions regarding this response, we nevertheless analyzed it in a preregistered secondary analysis, using the same procedure as above, but excluding those harmonics that overlapped with the 2.4 Hz response, as recommended by Retter et al (2021). The analysis of the 1.2 Hz response revealed 2 harmonics with z > 2.32, at 3.6 Hz (2F) and 6 Hz (3F).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency tagged brain responses are often not only evident at the frequency of stimulation ( F ) but also across its higher harmonics (2 F , 3 F , etc.). Therefore, to accurately capture the evoked brain response, the relevant harmonics should be summed (Retter et al, 2021; Retter & Rossion, 2016). Based on the previous study (Oomen et al, 2022), which was in turn based on visual inspection of pilot data, we included the first 8 harmonics (1.66 Hz, 3.33 Hz, 5.00 Hz, 6.66 Hz, 8.33 Hz, 10.00 Hz, 11.66 Hz, 13.33 Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%