2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on on-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2016.7604700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware Trojans classification for gate-level netlists based on machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasegawa et al [26] extracted 5 Trojan netlist features through the preliminary analysis of normal circuit and Trojan circuit and applied support vector machine(SVM) to the detection of HTs in gate-level netlists for the first time. The experimental results showed that the trained SVM classifier can achieve 100% TPR in some cases.…”
Section: B Gate-level Netlists Detection Based On Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasegawa et al [26] extracted 5 Trojan netlist features through the preliminary analysis of normal circuit and Trojan circuit and applied support vector machine(SVM) to the detection of HTs in gate-level netlists for the first time. The experimental results showed that the trained SVM classifier can achieve 100% TPR in some cases.…”
Section: B Gate-level Netlists Detection Based On Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the outcome of these parameters, classification of the circuit under test is done using different classifiers such as support vector machines, random forest classifiers etc. The different types of hardware Trojans and its threat models are analyzed in [9][10][11]. In [11], hardware Trojan nets are identified by the proposed Support vector machine based classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different types of hardware Trojans and its threat models are analyzed in [9][10][11]. In [11], hardware Trojan nets are identified by the proposed Support vector machine based classifier. The static detection process is discussed her, which does not require any test patterns for activating the Trojan model and also avoids the use of reference golden chip for the analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental results of existing machine-learningbased hardware-Trojan detection methods So far, some existing machine-learning hardware-Trojan detection methods are as follows: support vector machine (SVM)-based hardware-Trojan detection method, 22 neural network (NN)-based hardware-Trojan detection method, 23 random forest (RF)-based hardware-Trojan detection method, 24 and multi-layer neural network (MNN)-based hardware-Trojan detection method. 25 The true positive rate (TPR) and the true negative rate (TNR) are used by Hasegawa et al 22 and Inoue et al 26 to evaluate the detection results. In addition to the TPR and the TNR, Hasegawa et al 24 also used the Accuracy, the Precision, and the F-measure to evaluate the detection results and proposed that the F-measure is the best to measure the results very well.…”
Section: Hardware-trojan Detection Process For Gate-level Netlistmentioning
confidence: 99%