2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2004.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware–software co-simulation of bus-based reconfigurable systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. (16) Among these, the last equation is the most restrictive, since values monotonically decrease with . Also, since a gap occurs after load transfer to , we have (17) From (16) and 17, we can see that .…”
Section: A Without Front-endmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…. (16) Among these, the last equation is the most restrictive, since values monotonically decrease with . Also, since a gap occurs after load transfer to , we have (17) From (16) and 17, we can see that .…”
Section: A Without Front-endmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) Among these, the last equation is the most restrictive, since values monotonically decrease with . Also, since a gap occurs after load transfer to , we have (17) From (16) and 17, we can see that . Since the load fractions are monotonically decreasing, we also have (18) To ensure minimum possible processing time, load transfer to must start immediately after configuration.…”
Section: A Without Front-endmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, this simulator does not support the feature of dynamic reconfiguration. Vikram and Vasudevan designed a behavior simulator for hardware-software co-simulation of reconfigurable systems [7]. This tool is a hybrid system in which the reconfigurable array is designed by Verilog HDL and the micro-controller is implemented by integrating RSIM [8] -a Cbased micro-processor simulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%