2016
DOI: 10.1109/jetcas.2016.2528721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware Implementation of Associative Memories Based on Multiple-Valued Sparse Clustered Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the information content of Willshaw-Potts vectors is low, the crit N is higher than for the Willshaw network. This network was rediscovered as the GB network in [58] with various modifications [3,59] and hardware implementations (for example, [117] with non-binary connections). The GB network is oriented for exact retrieval of vectors with distortion by deletion (columns without values activate all neurons).…”
Section: Willshaw-potts Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the information content of Willshaw-Potts vectors is low, the crit N is higher than for the Willshaw network. This network was rediscovered as the GB network in [58] with various modifications [3,59] and hardware implementations (for example, [117] with non-binary connections). The GB network is oriented for exact retrieval of vectors with distortion by deletion (columns without values activate all neurons).…”
Section: Willshaw-potts Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the information content of Willshaw-Potts vectors is low, the crit N is higher than for the Willshaw network. This network was rediscovered as the GB network in [58] with various modifications [3,59] and hardware implementations (for example, [117] with non-binary connections). The GB network is oriented for exact retrieval of vectors with distortion by deletion (columns without values activate all neurons).…”
Section: Potts Namsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the robustness of the centralized algorithm is poor compared with the distributed one under the scenario of single-point failure. Thirdly, the distributed algorithm has good scalability for easy implementation of plugging-in and plugging-out of the micro unit clusters [23], which is also easy to be maintained under a lower operation cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%