2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1542511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardship and Modification (or 'Revision') of the Contract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fact that some countries admit a mechanism that allows to modify or extinguish contracts in case of hardship (civil law) and others reject (common law) can be detrimental to the economic competitiveness and to the quality/seriousness of payers and contractual fairness 790 . Even if common law parties generally conclude very long and detailed contracts in order to comprise all possible hardship scenarios 791 , there will inevitably be situations that fall outside all parties' predictability horizon (the human cognitive capacity to foresee the future is limited) and that will strongly impact performance, although not making such performance impossible or completely frustrated.…”
Section: Necessary Cut-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the fact that some countries admit a mechanism that allows to modify or extinguish contracts in case of hardship (civil law) and others reject (common law) can be detrimental to the economic competitiveness and to the quality/seriousness of payers and contractual fairness 790 . Even if common law parties generally conclude very long and detailed contracts in order to comprise all possible hardship scenarios 791 , there will inevitably be situations that fall outside all parties' predictability horizon (the human cognitive capacity to foresee the future is limited) and that will strongly impact performance, although not making such performance impossible or completely frustrated.…”
Section: Necessary Cut-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, the rules stand on a middle ground where, on the one hand, are not so vague as to cause instability and swallow pacta sunt servanda, but, on the other hand, are not so narrow as to the point of preventing its application 926 . Additionally, some degree of vagueness in the provisions' wording was important to incorporate the differences among legal systems 927 .…”
Section: Hardshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations