1925
DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1925_108_027_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardness Tests Research: Report on the Effects of Adhesion between the Indenting Tool and the Material in Ball and Cone Indentation Hardness Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1934
1934
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have therefore ignored friction in the following analysis. However, we note that if Hankins' (1925) model is accepted, then the importance of a large included angle for the cusps in this situation is clearly one of reducing friction.…”
Section: Indentation Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We have therefore ignored friction in the following analysis. However, we note that if Hankins' (1925) model is accepted, then the importance of a large included angle for the cusps in this situation is clearly one of reducing friction.…”
Section: Indentation Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In general, these approaches all use plasticity theory to predict the yield pressure which the material exhibits as it is being penetrated. Discussions of this method of approach were presented by Tabor (19S1), Hill (19SO), Bishop et al (1945), and Hankins (1923). An extension of this approach to the viscoplastic case was presented by Rebinder and Semenenko (1949).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%