2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardness and residual stress in nanocrystalline ZrN films: Effect of bias voltage and heat treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…45,46 At too small grain sizes, the hardness can decrease as has been observed for CrN 47 and ZrN. 48 This has been explained by grain boundary sliding and an increased porosity due to the large amount of grain boundaries. 49,50 In this case, there is a large amount of amorphous or disordered material in the as-deposited film.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…45,46 At too small grain sizes, the hardness can decrease as has been observed for CrN 47 and ZrN. 48 This has been explained by grain boundary sliding and an increased porosity due to the large amount of grain boundaries. 49,50 In this case, there is a large amount of amorphous or disordered material in the as-deposited film.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Of which, the 22-specimen has the highest hardness of 339 HV with regard to the other groups. This phenomenon can be explained as follows: during the selective laser melting, the structure will be easily formed at a high solidification rate, as a result of increasing the material hardness, which is known as the established point-defect strengthening models [21,27]. In fact, the prior solidified layer was reheated and remelted by the subsequent laser energy input that can be severed as an anneal treatment.…”
Section: Microhardness and Residual Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern is suggestively caused by the incorporation of Zr atoms into the interstitial nitrogen sites. Alternatively, it may also have been caused by the incident of energetic particles which affected the surfaces during the film deposition …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%