2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001610100055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardening rules for finite deformation micropolar plasticity: Restrictions imposed by the second law of thermodynamics and the postulate of Il'iushin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to notice thatK p in Grammenoudis and Tsakmakis [22] is related to some gradient terms relative to the reference configuration and hence should satisfy some kind of compatibility conditions, but such compatibility conditions are not considered in [22]. Therefore, strictly speaking, that constitutive theory is wrong.…”
Section: The Micropolar Plasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to notice thatK p in Grammenoudis and Tsakmakis [22] is related to some gradient terms relative to the reference configuration and hence should satisfy some kind of compatibility conditions, but such compatibility conditions are not considered in [22]. Therefore, strictly speaking, that constitutive theory is wrong.…”
Section: The Micropolar Plasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, strictly speaking, that constitutive theory is wrong. However, one can defineK p to be only a linear map, which otherwise fulfills the same transformations conditions asK p in [22]. Then, the constitutive theory developed in Grammenoudis and Tsakmakis [22] will be correct, and this version is adopted here.…”
Section: The Micropolar Plasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations