2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11003-016-9967-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardening of SS316 Stainless Steel Caused by the Irradiation with Argon Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, irradiation assisted hardening in fcc metals is associated with the formation of Frank loops which, being sessile in nature, strongly impede the movement of dislocations [3,[18][19][20]. However, in the present study the main radiation-induced hardening effect is attributed to cavities formation.…”
Section: Eejp 2 (2021)contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Generally, irradiation assisted hardening in fcc metals is associated with the formation of Frank loops which, being sessile in nature, strongly impede the movement of dislocations [3,[18][19][20]. However, in the present study the main radiation-induced hardening effect is attributed to cavities formation.…”
Section: Eejp 2 (2021)contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…These values are comparable with those found in the literature. 3,4,34 For instance, Yabuuchi et al measured the hardness of unirradiated 316L stainless steel to be 1.5 GPa, with the hardness increasing to 5.3 GPa after irradiation with protons to 8 dpa. 34 Nanoindentation results in this study additionally suggest that the magnitude of irradiation hardening with damage level reached a plateau, an observation that has also been made in literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Nanoindentation results in this study additionally suggest that the magnitude of irradiation hardening with damage level reached a plateau, an observation that has also been made in literature. 3,4 The evolution of the plastic zone area during the fatigue tests is shown in Figure 4. No clear differences between irradiated and unirradiated specimens could be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations