2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: The influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
142
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(35 reference statements)
10
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average results of the compressive test are listed in Table 4 and shown in Figure 6a. The performance of the cast specimens is almost identical to results reported by Wolfs, Bos, and Salet (2019), while the performance of the printed specimens is slightly better. The addition of fibres seems to cause a minor decrease in strength for the cast specimens.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average results of the compressive test are listed in Table 4 and shown in Figure 6a. The performance of the cast specimens is almost identical to results reported by Wolfs, Bos, and Salet (2019), while the performance of the printed specimens is slightly better. The addition of fibres seems to cause a minor decrease in strength for the cast specimens.…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Cast and printed specimens without and with Fibraflex FF15E0 high-strength steel fibres were subjected to 3 mechanical tests: compressive cube strength, flexural bending test and crack-mouth opening displacement (CMOD). The printed specimens were tested in two directions, namely directions I (parallel to the print direction) and III (vertically perpendicular to print direction, as defined by (Wolfs, Bos, and Salet 2019). Printed specimens with Cem-FIL minibars 24 mm glass fibres were subjected CMOD testing, in direction I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other study such as Wolfs et al, Hosseini et al and Marchment et al focused on the bond between layers [38][39][40][41]. As previously reported in the literature, the interlayer adhesion between two printed layers is time sensitive [38].…”
Section: State Of the Art And Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Up to now, the effect of interlayer strength in the context of 3D printing has mainly been observed with extrusion-based techniques. Anisotropic behaviour was observed for mechanical strength of 3D-printed specimen [34][35][36][37], which is attributed to the oriented interface properties [38]. In [39], a flexural strength of a cement-based mortar with a water-to-binder-ratio of 0.42 for layers oriented perpendicular to a loading direction of 10.1 MPa was reported, whereas, for layers with parallel orientation, a reduced flexural strength of 5.3 MPa (approximately 48% strength loss) was determined.…”
Section: Effects On Interlayer Strengthmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition to this, the process of applying the layer has been identified to affect interlayer strength. In [34], it is stated that there is no significant effect on interlayer strength of 3D printed concrete when the distance from the nozzle to layer is changed. By contrast, [49] found an increase of the nozzle height to have a negative effect on interlayer strength of geopolymers mortars.…”
Section: Effects On Interlayer Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%