2014
DOI: 10.1107/s1600577514016269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard X-ray nanofocusing at low-emittance synchrotron radiation sources

Abstract: X-ray scanning microscopy relies on intensive nanobeams generated by imaging a highly brilliant synchrotron radiation source onto the sample with a nanofocusing X-ray optic. Here, using a Gaussian model for the central cone of an undulator source, the nanobeam generated by refractive X-ray lenses is modeled in terms of size, flux and coherence. The beam properties are expressed in terms of the emittances of the storage ring and the lateral sizes of the electron beam. Optimal source parameters are calculated to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies [17,20,21] of the effect of PE escape have often incorporated Monte Carlo (MC) modelling of electron trajectories, performed using programmes such as CASINO [23,24]. In the current paper, we present the first systematic simulation study of PE escape in MX accounting for: (1) the effects of a finite beam size comparable to the PE stopping range; (2) the effects of a finite crystal size matched to the FWHM of the beam; (3) the effect of variation in X-ray beam energy; and (4) the influence of the beam profile as a function of the dose received by the crystal over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies [17,20,21] of the effect of PE escape have often incorporated Monte Carlo (MC) modelling of electron trajectories, performed using programmes such as CASINO [23,24]. In the current paper, we present the first systematic simulation study of PE escape in MX accounting for: (1) the effects of a finite beam size comparable to the PE stopping range; (2) the effects of a finite crystal size matched to the FWHM of the beam; (3) the effect of variation in X-ray beam energy; and (4) the influence of the beam profile as a function of the dose received by the crystal over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results did not account for PE escape and were independent of beam and crystal size. (2) DE NoPE values were calculated as the ratio of the number of coherently scattered photons per unit volume, N C /σ 3 X , to the average global dose, D G , based on results of our simulations that did not account for PE escape-this included both our control simulations and simulations that used RADDOSE-3D dose maps. DE NoPE was insensitive to changes in beam and crystal size; within each set (RADDOSE-3D, control) results at 30 keV showed a standard deviation of 3% from the average, with averages at all other energies showing a standard deviation of less than 1%.…”
Section: Variation Of Diffraction Efficiency With Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation is based on the fact that electrons in an undulator source radiate in a random and uncorrelated fashion to each other. A recent study shows that one can approximate the central cone of electromagnetic radiation from an undulator source by an ensemble of Gaussian limited waves [20]. Nevertheless, some researchers suggest by incorporation of a higher-order of intensity correlation functions, the in-tegrated spectral of electromagnetic wave can be either Gaussian or non-Gaussian distributions [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now comment on the chosen values of the rms size (11) and divergence (10), which depend on how one fits the undulator field (13) [17], from which the effective Rayleigh range of undulator radiation was determined to be Z…”
Section: A Paraxial Description Of Undulator Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tandem with these developments, a host of experimental x-ray techniques have been developed over the last few decades that take advantage of partially coherent radiation, including x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy and scattering [5,6], coherent x-ray diffractive imaging [7][8][9], x-ray scanning microscopy [10], and x-ray nanoprobe spectroscopy [11]. The ability to make detailed predictions of the x-ray properties has become an important component in both the design and interpretation of these experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%