2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(02)01060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard X-ray imaging with microchannel plate optics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we believe that the geometry of existing MCPs, thoroughly studied and optimized for application of MCPs in X-ray [8] and neutron [19] optics, where requirements on the geometric accuracy is much stronger, …”
Section: The Mcp Transmission For a Neutron Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we believe that the geometry of existing MCPs, thoroughly studied and optimized for application of MCPs in X-ray [8] and neutron [19] optics, where requirements on the geometric accuracy is much stronger, …”
Section: The Mcp Transmission For a Neutron Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microchannel plates are currently widely used in electron multiplying and photon counting imaging applications [4]- [7] as well as in X-ray focusing applications [8]. The existing microchannel plates typically consist of several million microchannels fused together into a monolithic disk-like structure (a section of which is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraser et al (1993a) describe the focusing of parallel beams of 0.1-2 keV X-rays, while results for hard X-ray focusing (50-65 keV) are presented by Price et al (2002). The present paper is concerned with the performance of MCP optics in the FUV waveband defined by the bandpass filters discussed above.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in V. Grubsky, G.J. Price, and R. Willingale et al, the ultra-high aspect ratio (300:1) MPOs have regularly been produced and preliminary test results were obtained (Willingale et al 1998;Price et al 2002;Grubsky et al 2007). While the surface roughness was limited to 1 -2 nm, the test results were not better, due to the difficulty of the manufacturing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%