2017
DOI: 10.1177/0886109917718233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard Time

Abstract: As the number of women incarcerated in the United States continues to rise and their complex needs become more apparent, social workers must fortify their historical commitment to criminal justice reform. However, crafting more effective and compassionate responses to the needs of justice-involved women may very well require a more nuanced understanding of the holistic impact of incarceration on women's well-being than the current literature offers. Utilizing the framework of feminist standpoint epistemology, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article demonstrates that maximum-security offender classification for incarcerated women is a troubled identity associated with serious crimes, aggression and danger, long sentences, and rejection by society. Similar to previous research (Artz et al, 2012;Casey, 2018;Dastile, 2013) that indicates correctional institutions as spaces of denial, deprivation, and victimisation, for women classified as maximum-security offenders these dynamics seem to be also linked to their classification. Consequently, experiences of women classified as maximum offenders give an impression of an "othered" group within the correctional centre with lived experiences of differential treatment, segregation, being silenced through victimisation, dehumanisation, and labelling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article demonstrates that maximum-security offender classification for incarcerated women is a troubled identity associated with serious crimes, aggression and danger, long sentences, and rejection by society. Similar to previous research (Artz et al, 2012;Casey, 2018;Dastile, 2013) that indicates correctional institutions as spaces of denial, deprivation, and victimisation, for women classified as maximum-security offenders these dynamics seem to be also linked to their classification. Consequently, experiences of women classified as maximum offenders give an impression of an "othered" group within the correctional centre with lived experiences of differential treatment, segregation, being silenced through victimisation, dehumanisation, and labelling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although these studies have contributed significantly to providing an understanding of the experiences of incarcerated women, intersectional approach in female offending, gendered and culturally sensitive needs as well as systemic injustice that increased women's vulnerability to crime, few of these studies have focused on the classification of incarcerated women in correctional centres (Agboola & Rabe, 2018;Dastile, 2017;Herbig & Hesselink, 2016;Labane, 2012). Although women's experiences of incarceration have also been explored (Artz et al, 2012;Casey, 2018;Dastile, 2013) with incarceration understood to be an environment of denial, overcrowding, deprivation, victimisation, and dehumanisation, these studies have not explicated how different classification categories of incarcerated women experience these dynamics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%