Haptic Simulator for Trocar Insertion Training

Galvan, Aldo; Costa, Andrew K. Da; Shields, Jessica; Kho, Kimberly A.; Fey, Ann Majewicz

doi:10.1109/whc49131.2021.9517245

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Gesture Evaluation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These simulators aim to reproduce clinical contexts to allow the learner to train for a specific task. They can be purely virtual [86], augmented reality [87,88] or haptic [78,89]. The main advantage of using simulators comes from their ability to extract data from learners' gestures.…”

Section: Gesture Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Needle Insertion Haptic Simulation

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This short review updates an exhaustive one written by Correa et al in 2019 about haptic training simulation on needle insertion in the medical field. b) Recent findings: Latest works refine wellknown models and enhance setups and methods to facilitate generically getting experimental data. c) Summary:We provide a complementary focus on device specifications and recent models to render this specific haptic feedback on Computer-Based Simulators. Assessment approaches and the issues encountered when introducing such simulators into curricula are also discussed. FEM-based approaches still do not permit real-time computation but hybrid approaches as proposed by [1] may become a good compromise. Nonetheless, psychophysical studies should be performed to determine the haptic fidelity of the various approaches found in the literature, and embed them efficiently in medical curricula. This would permit to delay the necessary final hands-on training on patients that raises ethical issues.

show abstract