2021
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happiness, quality of life and their determinants among people with systemic sclerosis: a structural equation modelling approach

Abstract: Background Patients’ objectives and experiences must be core to the study and management of chronic diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although patient-reported outcomes have attracted increasing attention, evaluation of the impact of disease on the overall subjective well-being, equivalent to ‘happiness’, is remarkably lacking. Objectives To examine the determinants of happiness and quality of life in patients with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, psychological factors, such as personality traits and resilience, were not examined in this study, but are potential determinants of happiness and enjoyment of life that may influence the perceived impact of disease. 19,20 Although spiritual well-being was significantly associated with life satisfaction, some items of spiritual well-being (e.g. My life has been productive) overlap conceptually with life satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, psychological factors, such as personality traits and resilience, were not examined in this study, but are potential determinants of happiness and enjoyment of life that may influence the perceived impact of disease. 19,20 Although spiritual well-being was significantly associated with life satisfaction, some items of spiritual well-being (e.g. My life has been productive) overlap conceptually with life satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item scores are summed, and the measure is scored from 5 (Extremely Dissatisfied) to 35 (Extremely Satisfied). The total score was dichotomized into either dissatisfied (scores of [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or satisfied (scores of [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] for describing the current sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin involvement is a hallmark feature of this disease and has a particular relevance for classification criteria, diagnosis, identification of disease subsets, prediction of disease progression and patient perception of disease impact [ 1 ]. Skin changes often result in pain, body image disfigurement and dissatisfaction and functional limitation, contributing greatly to the disease impact upon health-related quality of life and overall life satisfaction [ 2 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the assessment of skin thickness is performed, both in clinical practice and in clinical trials, by means of a semi-quantitative score that consists of palpation of the skin at 17 sites to give the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) [ 3 ]. Despite its simplicity and fair validity, this method has several important limitations, including its dependence on rater experience and training, high intra- and inter-observer variability and low sensitivity to change [ 2 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%