2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0737-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happiness and Sexual Minority Status

Abstract: We used logistic regression on nationally representative data (General Social Survey, N = 10,668 and N = 6,680) to examine how sexual minority status related to happiness. We considered two central dimensions of sexual minority status—sexual behavior and sexual identity. We distinguished between same-sex, both-sex, and different-sex oriented participants. Because individuals transition between sexual behavior categories over the life course (e.g., from both-sex partners to only same-sex partners) and changes i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiences of bisexual and pansexual individuals in relationships are especially overlooked, as these populations are typically rendered invisible within a relationship context. Yet there is evidence that bisexual individuals report lower relationship quality and happiness, especially if currently in different‐sex unions (Thomeer & Reczek, ). A GAR perspective highlights relationship histories of bisexual individuals and other sexual minority and even heterosexual individuals, pointing to a need for a life course approach to understand how gender dynamics shift throughout different relationships with people of different genders.…”
Section: Diversity Beyond Same‐sex Cisgender‐member Couplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiences of bisexual and pansexual individuals in relationships are especially overlooked, as these populations are typically rendered invisible within a relationship context. Yet there is evidence that bisexual individuals report lower relationship quality and happiness, especially if currently in different‐sex unions (Thomeer & Reczek, ). A GAR perspective highlights relationship histories of bisexual individuals and other sexual minority and even heterosexual individuals, pointing to a need for a life course approach to understand how gender dynamics shift throughout different relationships with people of different genders.…”
Section: Diversity Beyond Same‐sex Cisgender‐member Couplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 A better understanding of bisexual orientation disparities in positive mental and physical health indicators can provide insight into the development of strength-based health interventions. [33][34][35] To our knowledge, no prior research has examined longitudinal associations between bisexual attraction during adolescence with cyber and health behaviors in young adulthood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Add Health, GUTS collected data from approximately 10,000 12-to-17 year olds only four years after Wave 1 of the Add Health study. Initially, this comparison seems stark; however, generally “the number of youth with same-sex attraction far exceed those who engage in same-sex behavior or who identify as gay” (Savin-Williams & Cohen, 2007, p. 31) and studies with youth (Garofalo, Wolf, Kessel, Palfrey, & Durant, 1998; Katz-Wise, 2014; Matthews, Blosnich, Farmer, & Adams, 2014; Rosario, Schrimshaw, Hunter, & Braun, 2006) and adult (Bostwick, Boyd, Hughes, & McCabe, 2010; Chandra, Mosher, Copen, & Sionean, 2011; Copen, Changdra, Febo-Vazquez, 2016; Diamond, 2008; Gates, 2010; Thomeer & Reczek, 2016; Xu, Sternberg, & Markowitz, 2010a; 2010b) samples have consistently shown concurrent and longitudinal within-person discrepancies between sexual attraction, behavior, and identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%