2007
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haplotype ofN-Acetyltransferase 1 and 2 and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: We examined the association between N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 (NAT1 and NAT2) haplotype and risk of pancreatic cancer by genotyping eight NAT1 and seven NAT2 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 532 patients and in 581 healthy controls (all non-Hispanic white) who were recruited at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from January 2000 to December 2006. Haplotypes were reconstructed by using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by using unconditional logistic r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, studies relating NAT2 and pancreatic cancer susceptibility should be carried out in Asia. Of the studies analyzed in this meta-analysis, three divided the patients into three phenotypes (rapid, intermediate, and slow) (Li et al, 2006;Jiao et al, 2007;Suzuki et al, 2008) whereas the other three studies only discriminated two phenotypes (rapid and slow) (Bartsch et al, 1998;Li et al, 2002;Ayaz et al, 2008). As we did not know what methods to use to represent the intermediate phenotype category in the two-phenotype studies, only the data of the rapid or slow phenotype individuals were taken from the first group of studies and compared to all subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, studies relating NAT2 and pancreatic cancer susceptibility should be carried out in Asia. Of the studies analyzed in this meta-analysis, three divided the patients into three phenotypes (rapid, intermediate, and slow) (Li et al, 2006;Jiao et al, 2007;Suzuki et al, 2008) whereas the other three studies only discriminated two phenotypes (rapid and slow) (Bartsch et al, 1998;Li et al, 2002;Ayaz et al, 2008). As we did not know what methods to use to represent the intermediate phenotype category in the two-phenotype studies, only the data of the rapid or slow phenotype individuals were taken from the first group of studies and compared to all subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing the full texts, four studies were excluded following our search terms (Gross et al, 1999;Agundez, 2008;Brand et al, 2010;Jang et al, 2012). Finally, we identified six studies for the meta-analysis (Bartsch et al, 1998;Li et al, 2002Li et al, , 2006Jiao et al, 2007;Ayaz et al, 2008;Suzuki et al, 2008). Detailed characteristics of these studies are provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations