2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12215-019-00425-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hankel operators on the Bergman spaces of Reinhardt domains and foliations of analytic disks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Moreover, for (smooth) convex domains in C 2 , holomorphy of the symbol along analytic discs in the boundary is also sufficient for compactness of the Hankel operator. Further contributions are in [Le10,ČS ¸17,CS ¸18,Clo19]; we refer the reader to the introduction in [CC ¸S ¸18] for a summary. The latter authors significantly reduce the regularity requirements on both the domain (Lipschitz in C 2 or convex in C n ) and the symbol (in C(Ω)) that is required to infer holomorphicity of the symbol along analytic discs in the boundary from compactness of the Hankel operator.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Moreover, for (smooth) convex domains in C 2 , holomorphy of the symbol along analytic discs in the boundary is also sufficient for compactness of the Hankel operator. Further contributions are in [Le10,ČS ¸17,CS ¸18,Clo19]; we refer the reader to the introduction in [CC ¸S ¸18] for a summary. The latter authors significantly reduce the regularity requirements on both the domain (Lipschitz in C 2 or convex in C n ) and the symbol (in C(Ω)) that is required to infer holomorphicity of the symbol along analytic discs in the boundary from compactness of the Hankel operator.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%