2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hangzhou criteria as downstaging criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: A multicenter study from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Korean group created a revised scoring system based on tumor size, tumor number and pretransplant AFP levels (< or =20, 20.1 to 200, 200.1 to 1000, >1000 ng/mL), allowing an expansion for candidate selection without adverse outcomes 108 indicating the possibility of LT for those who were beyond MC but fulfilled the Hangzhou criteria and pointing out that AFP >100 ng/mL was an independent prognostic factor among them 13 . In some cases, the Hangzhou criteria was also considered as a downstaging criteria for HCC patients before LT to lower the threshold for LT 111 . Then, a team from Italy proposed a score containing AFP and TTD (the AFP-TTD score) but no histopathologic features, which simplified the Hangzhou criteria 112 .…”
Section: Afp With Tumor Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Korean group created a revised scoring system based on tumor size, tumor number and pretransplant AFP levels (< or =20, 20.1 to 200, 200.1 to 1000, >1000 ng/mL), allowing an expansion for candidate selection without adverse outcomes 108 indicating the possibility of LT for those who were beyond MC but fulfilled the Hangzhou criteria and pointing out that AFP >100 ng/mL was an independent prognostic factor among them 13 . In some cases, the Hangzhou criteria was also considered as a downstaging criteria for HCC patients before LT to lower the threshold for LT 111 . Then, a team from Italy proposed a score containing AFP and TTD (the AFP-TTD score) but no histopathologic features, which simplified the Hangzhou criteria 112 .…”
Section: Afp With Tumor Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RFS and OS of patients without MVI within the MC were the best survival [ 35 , 36 ]. Moreover, the HC can provide an ideal prognosis in comparison to the MC, give more patients access to LT, and serve as a demarcation for better or worse outcomes [37] . Further analysis of our results found that survival curves of RFS at the ZFA center proved that there was a significant difference in/beyond the MC with/without MVI in terms of different post-transplant outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have not placed upper limits on the number and size of HCC nodules for downstaging. The only limits were the absence of vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]. A flaw of these studies is that the outcome analysis was not performed with the intention-to-treat purpose in most cases.…”
Section: Upper Limits For Downstaging?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the published studies on downstaging have used the MC as a successful endpoint of downstaging. Recently, a retrospective multicentre study in China [ 67 ] investigated the endpoint of downstaging the Hangzhou Criteria (HC): (a) reduction in total tumour diameter ≤ 8 cm or (b) total tumour diameter > 8 cm with grade I or II tumour differentiation but AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL. Successfully downstaged patients had OS and recurrence rates after transplantation comparable to those always within the HC, while the OS rates of patients downstaged to within the MC and within the HC were the same.…”
Section: Upper Limits For Downstaging?mentioning
confidence: 99%