2014 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cicn.2014.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handwritten Bangla Word Recognition Using Elliptical Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we have compared the performance of the proposed H‐WordNet model with state‐of‐the‐art methods. For comparison, we have considered the holistic word recognition approaches reported in [4, 17–19, 36, 38]. Also, the efficacy of two deep learning models such as deep stacked autoencoder [53] and fire module based CNN [54] is compared.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we have compared the performance of the proposed H‐WordNet model with state‐of‐the‐art methods. For comparison, we have considered the holistic word recognition approaches reported in [4, 17–19, 36, 38]. Also, the efficacy of two deep learning models such as deep stacked autoencoder [53] and fire module based CNN [54] is compared.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have obtained an accuracy of 79.12% on a database including 119 town names of West Bengal state (each city name represents a class) with 300 samples from each class. In [19], elliptical features are utilised along with five different classifiers to holistically recognise the handwritten Bangla words. They have validated their method on a newly formed dataset that holds 51 samples from 20 different word classes, and have achieved a accuracy of 77.94% with the MLP classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a study used HMM to recognise Bangla words and reached 85.49% efficiency [17]. Bhowmik, et al [18] applied the elliptical feature extraction method and various classifiers like the Naïve Bayes, Bagging, Dagging, SVM, MLP, to evaluate the performance of the classifiers, achieving accuracies of 74.41%, 60.00%, 69.41%, 77.35%, and 77.94%, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that SVM and ANN performed better in recognising Bangla words compared to the other classifiers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x new = x old + P band * ε (1) where, x old is the existing pitch or solution from the HM, and x new is the pitch value after adjusting the existing pitch value. This basically generates a novel solution in the region of the prevailing solution by a small variation in the pitch value 22 .…”
Section: Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 99%