2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2016.7757580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hands-on and Virtual laboratories to undergraduate Chemistry education: Toward a pedagogical integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the dissimilarity matrix and box-plots, we observed that there was a significant improvement in the experimental self-efficacy of students after the introduction of virtual labs in their curriculum. The use of simulations and animations in UG courses have contributed to the improvement of student learning with visual and kinesthetic tools enhancing and reinforcing student understanding in ways that rote learning may not (Ramos et al 2016). Previous work has indicated the importance of self-efficacy in science education (Makransky et al 2016a;Thisgaard M and Makransky 2017).…”
Section: Experimental Self-efficacy Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the dissimilarity matrix and box-plots, we observed that there was a significant improvement in the experimental self-efficacy of students after the introduction of virtual labs in their curriculum. The use of simulations and animations in UG courses have contributed to the improvement of student learning with visual and kinesthetic tools enhancing and reinforcing student understanding in ways that rote learning may not (Ramos et al 2016). Previous work has indicated the importance of self-efficacy in science education (Makransky et al 2016a;Thisgaard M and Makransky 2017).…”
Section: Experimental Self-efficacy Of Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a chemistry course for undergraduate engineering students, virtual labs were integrated with hands-on experiments (Ramos et al, 2016). The results indicated that this combination assisted in the performance improvement in hands-on laboratory and that could contribute to the improvement of student learning.…”
Section: Blended Usage Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these students, the mean score of six survey items that explored the impact of the virtual lab was at least 6.1 (Goulding et al, 2016) suggesting that the students believed the virtual lab prepared them for on-site labs. Ramos et al (2016) provide a more in-depth account of the impact of virtual labs in preparing students for on-site labs. In an undergraduate chemistry course, 32 out of 120 students agreed to complete a virtual lab before an on-site lab and answer two questionnaires about the usefulness and effectiveness of the virtual lab and their perceived impact of the virtual lab on their performance in the on-site lab (Ramos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramos et al (2016) provide a more in-depth account of the impact of virtual labs in preparing students for on-site labs. In an undergraduate chemistry course, 32 out of 120 students agreed to complete a virtual lab before an on-site lab and answer two questionnaires about the usefulness and effectiveness of the virtual lab and their perceived impact of the virtual lab on their performance in the on-site lab (Ramos et al, 2016). According to Ramos et al (2016), responses to the post-virtual lab survey indicated that 96% of the students found the lab helped them learn about the experiment and 79% of the students anticipated that their virtual lab experience would prepare them for the on-site lab.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation