2002
DOI: 10.4017/gt.2001.01.03.006.00
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handrails for the elderly: A survey of the need for handrails and experiments to determine the optimal size of staircase handrails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the optimal set height for a handrail and anthropometry did not have strong correlations for Japanese rural elderly people (Ishihara et al, 2002). Kolich (2003) found discrepancies between anthropometrical criteria and preferred settings for car seats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the optimal set height for a handrail and anthropometry did not have strong correlations for Japanese rural elderly people (Ishihara et al, 2002). Kolich (2003) found discrepancies between anthropometrical criteria and preferred settings for car seats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramps should be set alongside the stairs where elders may easily stumble. If there are too many stairs or the ramps are too long, handrails should be installed along them at a proper height (e.g., 666-778 mm as optimal [88]). Folding seats are also suggested to be installed on the walls along the building stairs, which can help elders to take a rest.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhalla (1997) in a study revealed that the major problems faced by the elderly were absence of railings/grab handles, too high working counters and storage shelves, slippery floor finishes, low height of electric switches, small sized rooms and unsuitable stairs. Ishihara et al (2002) also found that handrails inside and outside of the home are considered useful in assisting elderly people who live independently. So, a list of suggestions, to avoid or overcome these problems, was made and the respondents were asked to rank them according to their preferences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%