40th IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology
DOI: 10.1109/vetec.1990.110333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handover criteria for city microcellular radio systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional handoff decision algorithms are based on the RSSI [11]- [12]. If the RSSI is smaller than a certain threshold, the handoff from one AP to the other occurs.…”
Section: Proposed Handoff Decision Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional handoff decision algorithms are based on the RSSI [11]- [12]. If the RSSI is smaller than a certain threshold, the handoff from one AP to the other occurs.…”
Section: Proposed Handoff Decision Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the user is moving with constant speed the soft handover probability can be expressed by Equation (5) below. Considering scenario in Figure 2(a) as an illustrative example the soft handover probability can be computed using Equation (6).…”
Section: Soft Handover Probability Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, growing demand for supporting higher multimedia data rate, streaming video, and Internet services on 3G networks has been demanding further minimization of soft handover and its failure. As the soft handovers become inevitable over cell boundaries of a cellular mobile network when a MS penetrates into the new cell (target cell) and number of handovers determines the quality of service (QoS) of the network, therefore minimizing number of soft handovers has been an important consideration in development of handover algorithms [4][5][6][7][8][9]. A good handover algorithm is expected to meet both the bounds-1) minimum number of handovers for maintaining QoS and 2) low probability of handover failures due to limited target cell resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcells are more sensitive to the traffic and interference than macrocells due to short-term variations (e.g., traffic and interference variations), medium/long-term alterations (e.g., new buildings), and incremental growth of the radio network (e.g., new BSs) [10]. The number of handoffs per cell is increased by an order of magnitude, and the time available to make a handoff is decreased [11]. Using an umbrella cell is one way to reduce the handoff rate.…”
Section: Microcellsmentioning
confidence: 99%