1986
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-70058-2.50006-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling Uncertain Information: A Review of Numeric and Non-numeric Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding uncertainty in trust management, uncertainty logics provide various methods for representing and updating uncertainty/belief [3]. Jøsang [12] proposed subjective logic to represent uncertain trust values with an opinion triangle in which an opinion is represented as a triple (b, d, u) where b, d, u denote the degrees of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty respectively, and the sum of them equals to 1.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding uncertainty in trust management, uncertainty logics provide various methods for representing and updating uncertainty/belief [3]. Jøsang [12] proposed subjective logic to represent uncertain trust values with an opinion triangle in which an opinion is represented as a triple (b, d, u) where b, d, u denote the degrees of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty respectively, and the sum of them equals to 1.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that "very little has been done to perform reasoning or inferencing with information represented in terms of belief functions" [4]. Hence, using a domain ontology, which already provides a reasoning strategy in its structure to integrate this information seems to be a promising suggestion.…”
Section: Dempster-shafer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed presentation of Dempster's Rule, we refer the reader to [18], chapter 3, §1. A major advantage of the Dempster-Shafer theory is its explicit representation of ignorance [4] as it makes a clear distinction between the lack of knowledge and the assignment of degrees of belief to the negation of a proposition. Hence, there is no need for the belief of a proposition and the belief of its negation to sum up to 1 because remaining propositions will not be affected without explicit assignments.…”
Section: Dempster-shafer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interval structure provides a common framework that unifies the notions of lower/upper incidence sets [Bundy, 1985] and rough sets [Pawlak, 1982[Pawlak, , 1984. The non-numeric approach is also useful in symbolic computation, machine learning, classification and clustering [Bhatnagar and Kanal, 1986;Jean-Louis, 1991;Luzeaux, 1991;Orlowska, 1985;Pawlak, 1984].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms can be broadly divided into two categories: the numeric and non-numeric (or the qualitative and quantitative) approaches, which capture different but complementary aspects of uncertain knowledge [Bhatnagar and Kanal, 1986]. Typical examples of the numeric approach are probabilistic logic [Nilsson, 1986;Rescher, 1969], fuzzy logic [Dubois and Prade, 1988], belief measures [Nguyen, 1978;Shafer, 1976Shafer, , 1987Smets, 1988] and the calculus of certainty factors [Shortliffe, 1976].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%