2004
DOI: 10.4173/mic.2004.2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling State and Output Constraints in MPC Using Time-dependent Weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Hovd and Braatz (2001a) it was shown how to minimize this problem by using time-dependent weights in the optimization criterion.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Hovd and Braatz (2001a) it was shown how to minimize this problem by using time-dependent weights in the optimization criterion.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, such constraints may introduce many complexities that an industrial MPC controller needs to address. There has been particular focus on the effect of hard output constraints on stability (Zafiriou & Marchal, 1991;de Oliveira & Biegler, 1994) as well as the use of soft constraint formulations to ensure a feasible optimization problem, see Scokaert and Rawlings (1999), Vada (2000), Hovd and Braatz (2001a) and references therein. This paper advances the ideas shown in Hovd (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that it is desired for the softconstrained optimal control problem to yield the same solution as the original hard-constrained problem when the latter is feasible. This can be achieved using the exact penalty function method (e.g., see [27,28,29,30] and the references therein for details). …”
Section: Feasibility Of the Convex Smpc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another practical method for a priori selecting ρ is to choose ρ as large as possible such that numerical issues do not occur when solving (28). The idea is that at some point ρ max < ∞, the weight will be so large that changes in the original value function are not numerically discernible in the optimizer.…”
Section: Denote the Socp (28) By P S N (X) Define The Set Of Feasiblmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when systems demonstrate non-minimum phase characteristics, constraint softening methods may have reduced performance. An extension of constraint softening which also employs time-dependent weightings on the objective functions to improve controller performance is found in [13]. However, these methods do not sufficiently consider the effects of unknown disturbances and/or uncertainties which are often present in complex systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%