Handling Reboots and Mobility in 802.15.4 Security

Krentz, Konrad-Felix; Meinel, Christoph

doi:10.1145/2818000.2818002

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, to discover unknown bugs, researchers have fuzzified several stateful protocols (e.g., snmp, ftp, ssl, bgp, and smb) [79,167] and evaluated simple radio protocols (e.g., ZigBee, ZWave, WiFi, and Bluetooth) [80]. They also optimized these protocols, such as the 802.15.4 protocol [82], constrained application protocol (CoAP), and MQ telemetry transport (MQTT) protocol [81], to enhance their reliability and robustness.…”

Section: General Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Survey on Recent Advanced Research of CPS Security

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) are next-generation intelligent systems that integrate computing, communication, and control. Malicious attacks on CPSs can lead to both property damage and casualties. Therefore, it is worth surveying CPS security by reviewing and analyzing the latest high-quality related works. In this paper, we provide an overview of the CPS security studies from the last five years and select 142 related works from A- or B-level conferences/journals recommended by the China Computer Federation (CCF). First, we review the main contents of the selected papers and classify them into 24 topics. Then, we analyze hotspots and trends of CPS security technologies in three dimensions: (1) architecture layers (perception, network, and application); (2) application scenarios (smart grids, health care, smart transportation, smart homes, and general grids); and (3) MADC (Measure, Attack, Defense, and Control) types. Finally, we also perform a statistical analysis in terms of paper publication times, author institutes, countries, and sponsors to show the current worldwide CPS security research situation.

show abstract

Section: General Scenariosmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies about control have mainly been performed at the application layer and include device pairing, cloud service management, access control, and trusted computing. The other works mainly address key management [19,82] and encrypted communication schemes [83,106].…”

Section: Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Recent Advanced Research of CPS Security

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…SPINS (Security Protocol for Sensor Networks) scheme provides security for wireless sensor communication and obtains keys from the pre‐distributed master keys. Although AKES (Adaptive Key Establishment Scheme) system uses PAN ID and address of the sensor for authentication and key distribution, it follows pre‐distribution of keys to derive pairwise session keys. Unlike our LAUP, AKES uses the address of sensors to get the shared secret keys, whereas LAUP uses MAC ID of sensors.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testbed evaluation of Lightweight Authentication Protocol (LAUP) for 6LoWPAN wireless sensor networks

Baskaran

Nanda

Nepal

et al. 2018

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary 6LoWPAN networks involving wireless sensors consist of resource starving miniature sensor nodes. Since secured authentication is one of the important considerations, the use of asymmetric key distribution scheme may not be a perfect choice. Recent research shows that Lucky Thirteen attack has compromised Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode for key establishment. Even though EAKES6Lo and S3 K techniques for key establishment follow the symmetric key establishment method, they strongly rely on a remote server and trust anchor. Our proposed Lightweight Authentication Protocol (LAUP) used a symmetric key method with no preshared keys and comprised of four flights to establish authentication and session key distribution between sensors and Edge Router in a 6LoWPAN environment. Each flight uses freshly derived keys from existing information such as PAN ID (Personal Area Network IDentification) and device identities. We formally verified our scheme using the Scyther security protocol verification tool. We simulated and evaluated the proposed LAUP protocol using COOJA simulator and achieved less computational time and low power consumption compared to existing authentication protocols such as the EAKES6Lo and SAKES. LAUP is evaluated using real‐time testbed and achieved less computational time, which is supportive of our simulated results.

show abstract

“…SPINS (Security Protocol for Sensor Networks) [12] scheme provides security for wireless sensor communication also obtains keys from the pre-distributed master keys. Although AKES (Adaptive Key Establishment Scheme) [13] system uses PAN ID and address of the sensor for authentication and key distribution, it follows predistribution of keys to derive pairwise session keys. Unlike our LAUP, AKES uses the address of sensors to get the shared secret keys, whereas LAUP uses MAC ID of sensors.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lightweight Authentication Protocol (LAUP) for 6LoWPAN Wireless Sensor Networks

Roselin

Nanda

Nepal

2017

2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/Icess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

6LoWPAN networks involving wireless sensors consist of resource starving miniature sensor nodes. Since secured authentication of these resource-constrained sensors is one of the important considerations during communication, use of asymmetric key distribution scheme may not be the perfect choice to achieve secure authentication. Recent research shows that Lucky Thirteen attack has compromised Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode for key establishment. Even though EAKES6Lo and S3K techniques for key establishment follow the symmetric key establishment method, they strongly rely on a remote server and trust anchor for secure key distribution. Our proposed Lightweight Authentication Protocol (LAUP) used a symmetric key method with no preshared keys and comprised of four flights to establish authentication and session key distribution between sensors and Edge Router in a 6LoWPAN environment. Each flight uses freshly derived keys from existing information such as PAN ID (Personal Area Network IDentification) and device identities. We formally verified our scheme using the Scyther security protocol verification tool for authentication properties such as Aliveness, Secrecy, Non-Injective Agreement and Non-Injective Synchronization. We simulated and evaluated the proposed LAUP protocol using COOJA simulator with ContikiOS and achieved less computational time and low power consumption compared to existing authentication protocols such as the EAKES6Lo and SAKES.

show abstract

Handling Reboots and Mobility in 802.15.4 Security

Cited by 6 publications

References 30 publications

A Survey on Recent Advanced Research of CPS Security

A Survey on Recent Advanced Research of CPS Security

Testbed evaluation of Lightweight Authentication Protocol (LAUP) for 6LoWPAN wireless sensor networks

Lightweight Authentication Protocol (LAUP) for 6LoWPAN Wireless Sensor Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About