Handling Missing Data in Matched Case-Control Studies Using Multiple Imputation

Abstract

Summary. Analysis of matched case-control studies is often complicated by missing data on covariates. Analysis can be restricted to individuals with complete data, but this is inefficient and may be biased. Multiple imputation (MI) is an efficient and flexible alternative. We describe two MI approaches. The first uses a model for the data on an individual and includes matching variables; the second uses a model for the data on a whole matched set and avoids the need to model the matching variables. Within each approach, we consider three methods: full-conditional specification (FCS), joint model MI using a normal model, and joint model MI using a latent normal model. We show that FCS MI is asymptotically equivalent to joint model MI using a restricted general location model that is compatible with the conditional logistic regression analysis model. The normal and latent normal imputation models are not compatible with this analysis model. All methods allow for multiple partially-observed covariates, non-monotone missingness, and multiple controls per case. They can be easily applied in standard statistical software and valid variance estimates obtained using Rubin's Rules. We compare the methods in a simulation study. The approach of including the matching variables is most efficient. Within each approach, the FCS MI method generally yields the least-biased odds ratio estimates, but normal or latent normal joint model MI is sometimes more efficient. All methods have good confidence interval coverage. Data on colorectal cancer and fibre intake from the EPIC-Norfolk study are used to illustrate the methods, in particular showing how efficiency is gained relative to just using individuals with complete data.

The use of multiple imputation method for the validation of 24-h food recalls by part-time observation of dietary intake in school

“…Another sensitivity analysis with food records also showed high dependency of effect estimates on model assumptions regarding the covariance structure of measurement errors (2) . In addition, although MI bias reduction in comparison with complete case analysis has been corroborated in other studies (22,23) , the bias magnitude was still large in the present study. Finally, the large number of variables with considerable percentage of missing values makes MI estimates vulnerable to bias (38) .…”

Proteomic Biomarkers for Incident Aortic Stenosis Requiring Valvular Replacement

“…The imputation thus included some of the matching variables but excluded the identifier of matched pairs, consistent with the method described by Seaman and Keogh. 14 The numbers of imputed values are shown in Table II in the online-only Data Supplement. Conditional logistic regression models were adjusted with coefficients and standard errors for the variability between imputations, according to the combination rules by Rubin.…”

Effectiveness of aggression replacement training in reducing criminal recidivism among convicted adult offenders

“…We used the multiple imputation method with full conditional specification (Schafer, 1999;Scheffer, 2002;van Buuren, 2007) to manage missing covariate data. This has been reported as the most reliable method for managing missing data (Lee & Carlin, 2010;Seaman & Keogh, 2015;Welch, Bartlett, & Petersen, 2014). With this approach, several new data sets are created from original data and missing values replaced by probable values.…”