2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling confounding variables in statistical shape analysis - application to cardiac remodelling

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ventricular Shape Statistical Analysis Ventricular shape analysis followed a previously described framework. 20 This framework enables identification of the main regional shape pattern that encodes the differences between 2 populations and enables quantification of the amount of that pattern in each individual. Ventricular shape variability between the groups was assessed by principal component analysis applied to the end-diastolic surfaces obtained from CMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ventricular Shape Statistical Analysis Ventricular shape analysis followed a previously described framework. 20 This framework enables identification of the main regional shape pattern that encodes the differences between 2 populations and enables quantification of the amount of that pattern in each individual. Ventricular shape variability between the groups was assessed by principal component analysis applied to the end-diastolic surfaces obtained from CMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Ventricular shape differences between those born SGA and controls were assessed by SSA. 7,10,20 Statistical shape analysis was used to compute a reference shape for each population (controls and SGA) separately to compare them. Next, the specific remodeling in each individual (biventricular remodeling score) was estimated.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariates used in this study to investigate the impact of diversity in the classification of ASD may have a confounding effect in how the brain scanning measurements are used to predict diagnostic categories. In fact, numerous earlier studies have tried to account for nuisance sources by deconfounding the imaging-derived variables in what is often thought as a data-cleaning step (Alfaro-Almagro et al, 2020; Bernardino et al, 2020; Bzdok et al, 2020; Snoek et al, 2019). For instance, considering the sex of the subjects, we could find that males are more prone to be classified as ASD than females.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Wearables" was the smallest single group with fou (14%) studies [20,25,28,37]. The final six (21%) unassigned studies [4,19,24,33,36,39] wer Of the 49 studies that remained, 1 study was excluded from the review due to issues with accessing the full manuscript, leaving 48 studies to be included for full-text readings and to form the dataset for this review. However, during the full-text readings, a further 20 studies were excluded: 16 were excluded as they were deemed to be not relevant to the review, and the other 4 were excluded due to concerns about their quality, i.e., being vague and having an unclear description of either their methodology or approach used to develop their models, how the evaluation criteria were presented, and why certain metrics were used over others.…”
Section: Study Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%