2009
DOI: 10.3182/20090706-3-fr-2004.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling Certain Structure Information in Subspace Identification

Abstract: The prediction-error approach to parameter estimation of linear models often involves solving a non-convex optimization problem. In some cases, it is therefore difficult to guarantee that the global optimum will be found. A common way to handle this problem is to find an initial estimate, hopefully lying in the region of attraction of the global optimum, using some other method. The prediction-error estimate can then be obtained by a local search starting at the initial estimate. In this paper, a new approach … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of imposing some structure into the subspace method could be found in [6] where they try to identify OE and ARMAX models using subspace methods. In [7] and [8] they want to guarantee that the identified model with a subspace method is stable when the true linear system is known to be stable.…”
Section: Other Methods and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem of imposing some structure into the subspace method could be found in [6] where they try to identify OE and ARMAX models using subspace methods. In [7] and [8] they want to guarantee that the identified model with a subspace method is stable when the true linear system is known to be stable.…”
Section: Other Methods and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method here solves this problem by finding a similarity transform that takes the system to cascade form while minimizing the mean square error between the estimated output and the measured output. The method introduced here is related to the method proposed in [6] where OE and ARMAX models are estimated with subspace methods by finding suitable transformations, to get the system to the desired form. The method denoted method 1 has three steps:…”
Section: A Methods 1: Indirect Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for estimation of gray-box models for industrial robots have been considered in [19], and in [20] with a method based on a least-squares approach. Moreover, structural reformulations in subspace identification, similar to the one used in this paper, for general dynamic systems have been investigated in [21], [22]. The main contribution of this paper is the development and validation of a time-domain (in contrast to previously suggested frequency-domain and leastsquares methods addressing the same problem) subspacebased gray-box identification method for continuous-time mechanical system models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prior information on locations of poles was found beneficial in subspace identification [17], [18]. Modified subspace methods have been proposed for systems with known model structures including large-scale circulant systems [19], cascade systems [20], the Output Error (OE) and AutoRegressive Moving Average with eXternal input (AR-MAX) models [21]. Pre-specification of zero transfer functions in identified state-space models were also studied [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%