Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3341163.3347744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling annotation uncertainty in human activity recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, due to the absence of an affective response, the normal windows are same as the distracted windows when analyzed using the physiological and the visual sensors. To mitigate this problem, one might use methods that explicitly incorporate label jitter into the model training process [78]. The label jitter may be why the performance on the physiological signals is worse than that on the visual signals for the detection of the driving distractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, due to the absence of an affective response, the normal windows are same as the distracted windows when analyzed using the physiological and the visual sensors. To mitigate this problem, one might use methods that explicitly incorporate label jitter into the model training process [78]. The label jitter may be why the performance on the physiological signals is worse than that on the visual signals for the detection of the driving distractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our current practice of using majority voting is also unable to deal with the situation when multiple activities exist on the same frame. For this problem, we plan to follow the recent progress in ambiguous activity annotation [33] to drive our future research. 6.1.2 Limited Interaction between HAR and PBD Modules.…”
Section: The Challenge and Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, discriminating the margin between activity-of-interest and transition is often difficult and may lead to the misclassification of transition toward AoIs, as shown in Section 5.3. We plan to follow recent progress on ambiguous activity annotation [31] to deal with such uncertainty in the next.…”
Section: The Challenge and Current Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such outlier samples impose, if not treated properly, challenges for HAR models to learn effective motion features for target activities. Previous work showed that handling outlier samples in HAR datasets is important and, if successful, can significantly improve the performance of the resulting HAR model [91][92][93].…”
Section: Uncertainty Modeling For Noisy Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%