2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling and Pathology Reporting of Renal Tumor Specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gross handling of nephrectomy specimens was done according to the standard protocol for examining nephrectomy specimens (Rosai 2004;Algaba et al 2004;Fleming and GriYths 2005). Representative tissue blocks were taken and processed for paraYn embedding, hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stained and examined by two experienced pathologists with special interest in renal, transplant and urologic pathology (JIK and MM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross handling of nephrectomy specimens was done according to the standard protocol for examining nephrectomy specimens (Rosai 2004;Algaba et al 2004;Fleming and GriYths 2005). Representative tissue blocks were taken and processed for paraYn embedding, hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stained and examined by two experienced pathologists with special interest in renal, transplant and urologic pathology (JIK and MM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Based on the findings of routinely conducted histological assessments, patients are grouped into 5 major histologic subtypes, which differ in prognosis and response to anti-tumor therapy. 20,21 Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent histologic subtype being assigned to 70-80% of all RCC patients. The prognosis of patients with ccRCCs is less favorable compared with papillary (chromophile) RCCs accounting for 10-15% of RCCs and chromophobe RCCs being responsible for 3-5% of RCC cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, speedy assessment of specimen resection margin may justify the additional few minutes of warm ischaemia, especially in the selected group. Finally, manipulation and cutting through the specimen before inking, which can alter microscopic final pathological results, can be avoided using ex vivo US [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%